ShareThis Page

Iranians choose from culled ballot

| Thursday, Feb. 25, 2016, 11:00 p.m.

Iranians will vote Friday in national elections that once had the potential to be pivotal until almost every would-be candidate advocating reform was barred from running.

With only a limited number of moderates and reformers on the ballot, analysts say the election is unlikely to foreshadow a history-making moment of change in Iran. The parliament and many other government bodies will continue to be dominated by conservatives, constraining the ability of Hassan Rouhani, Iran's pragmatist president, to push through reforms.

But the election — the first since a nuclear deal lifted most of the international sanctions that had hobbled economic growth — is being closely watched nevertheless.

Though opposition activists call the election a sham, the vote totals could open a small window onto the Iranian appetite for change and Rouhani's political future.

Many Western officials hoped the nuclear deal's implementation in January would pave the way for Rouhani to introduce measures granting civil liberties and less Internet censorship, as he promised when he was elected in 2013. Now the best-case scenario is that urbanized voters in Tehran give Rouhani a small but strong minority to support economic reform.

“At the end of the day, it's going to be seen as a referendum on Rouhani's policies,” said Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, who is writing a book about the Iranian nuclear deal that was implemented in January. “We'll see how many people back Rouhani, mindful of the fact he hasn't delivered on opening up society, on civil rights or human rights.”

At stake are 290 seats in the parliament, or the Majles, an institution with limited powers but capable of blocking initiatives from the president's office. There are 6,200 candidates, but that is barely half the number who initially registered to run. A hard-line body known as the Guardian Council disqualified more hopefuls than ever before in the 37 years since the Islamic revolution.

Nine moderate parties estimated that only 1 percent of the 3,000 reformist candidates who registered were permitted to run. Among those rejected were three dozen current members of parliament.

On the ballot are more female candidates than ever in a country where only 49 women have served in parliament since 1979. This time, 584 women are running, though about 800 were disqualified.

The election also will determine the Assembly of Experts, a uniquely Iranian council of 88 mostly elderly clerics who are nominally charged with selecting the next supreme leader if the ailing, 76-year-old Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dies in the next eight years of the assembly's term. That candidate list also has been culled. Hassan Khomeini, the grandson of the founder of the Islamic republic, was disqualified because he is close to reformist politicians.

Parliamentary elections in Iran rarely alter the country's fundamental policies.

“Voters have the option to choose different shades of status-quo conservatives along with some meek reformists,” said Karim Sadjadpour, an analyst with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “The results of the supreme leader's latest medical checkup will likely prove more consequential to Iran's political future than the results of the Majles elections.”

Despite having the odds against them, the moderates and reformers are campaigning to make the election as competitive as possible. They have used social media to disseminate a list of 30 reformist candidates they endorse for parliament and 18 for the Assembly of Experts. They are calling the alliance of reformists and moderates the ‘”Second Step,” to build on Rouhani's reforms.

“The point they are making, in order to increase voter participation, is that voting hard-liners out at this juncture will send a powerful message of popular sentiments in support of the country's redirection since 2013,” said Farideh Farhi, a Middle East scholar at the University of Hawaii.

Conversely, a poor performance at the ballot box would be a huge setback for the weak reform movement.

“If conservatives win, having been given a leg up by the unfair electoral system, it will also be a powerful message that they have the means and instruments to create obstacles for Rouhani's redirection of the country,” Farhi said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.