ShareThis Page

Texas governor: Latinos shouldn't fear 'sanctuary city' ban

| Tuesday, May 16, 2017, 9:21 p.m.
University Of Texas Student Vanessa Rodriguez speaks during a protest outside of the Texas Governor's Mansion in Austin. The gathering was to protest Texas' new 'sanctuary cities' law, which takes effect in September and which critics say is the most anti-immigrant since a 2010 Arizona law, that will allow police officers to ask about the immigration status of anyone they detain, including during routine traffic stops.
University Of Texas Student Vanessa Rodriguez speaks during a protest outside of the Texas Governor's Mansion in Austin. The gathering was to protest Texas' new 'sanctuary cities' law, which takes effect in September and which critics say is the most anti-immigrant since a 2010 Arizona law, that will allow police officers to ask about the immigration status of anyone they detain, including during routine traffic stops.

AUSTIN — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott sought to dispel fears that the state's new ban on so-called sanctuary cities will contribute to racial profiling, saying Tuesday that Hispanics shouldn't be afraid police will stop them and ask for proof of their legal residency unless they're “suspected of having committed some serious crime.”

Opponents fired back that no such safeguards are written into the law, which will allow Texas police officers to ask a person about their immigration status during routine stops starting in September.

The law signed this month by Abbott, a Republican, gives police the right to ask residency questions during any “lawful detention or arrest.” That provision is already stoking fear in Hispanic and immigrant communities, according to Democrats and immigrant-rights groups who say the wording is so broad that stops over broken taillights or speeding could lead to deportation.

Abbott dismissed that idea as fearmongering during a livestreamed Facebook interview with a Univision reporter in Austin.

“If you are Hispanic, or frankly anybody from any other country, you are not going to be stopped and required to show your papers unless you are suspected of having committed some serious crime,” he said. He added that prohibitions against racial profiling by police will be “strictly enforced” and invoked his wife, Cecilia Abbott, who is Hispanic and the granddaughter of Mexican immigrants.

“As the husband of the first Hispanic first lady in the state of Texas, I want to make sure that neither she nor her family is going to be stopped and detained inappropriately,” Abbott said.

Cecilia Abbott joined the wives of lawmakers in the Texas Senate on Tuesday. Approached by a reporter about the law and whether she feared getting stopped, an aide stepped in and said the first lady would not be commenting. John Wittman, a spokesman for the governor, said later that “the answer is no, she's not worried about getting pulled over.”

Outside on the steps of the Texas Capitol, Democrats and local officials from Texas' biggest cities held a rally reiterating their vows to challenge the law in court and pledged what they called a “summer of resistance” before it takes effect. The law was opposed by every big-city police chief in Texas, who worry that immigrants will be more reluctant to come forward as witnesses or crime victims. At least one lawsuit has already been filed in federal court.

Democratic state Rep. Eddie Rodriguez, of Austin, said maybe the governor would realize the law went too far if a member of his family was stopped and detained.

“The problem is he's already signed it into law. There's nothing to do about it now unless we come back and try to change it next session,” Rodriguez said. “And I don't have to tell you how hard that's going to be to soften an immigration bill.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.