ShareThis Page

NAACP will oust its president and revamp to better combat 'an uncertain era' under Trump

| Friday, May 19, 2017, 8:45 p.m.
The NAACP is moving on from its president, Cornell W. Brooks, who will serve out his contract through June 30.

Saying it needed “the right leadership,” the nation's most prominent black American advocacy group announced on Friday that it was ousting its president and embarking on a period of soul-searching to reposition itself in an “uncertain era” in the fight for civil rights.

The move from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People comes as the group has been seen in some circles as taking a back seat to long-standing and newer civil rights groups and movements that have risen to prominence in battles over police shootings, immigration and LGBT rights.

These groups and movements include the American Civil Liberties Union, which recently gained wins against President Donald Trump in federal courts, and Black Lives Matters activists, who won private meetings with President Barack Obama as they grew a youth-centered grass-roots movement against racism and police violence.

For the venerable NAACP, its new mission involves modern branding techniques and greater outreach.

“We believe as an organization, we need to retool to become better advocates, better at educating the pubic, better at involving them,” Derrick Johnson, vice chairman of the NAACP board of directors, said in a conference call announcing the change.

Johnson said the group would embark on a national “listening tour” as part of its re-branding. That kind of tour, which is a common strategy among politicians as they seek to gain public support, has never been done in the NAACP's 108-year history, Johnson said.

“These changing times require us to be vigilant and agile, but we have never been more committed or ready for the challenges ahead,” NAACP board chairman Leon W. Russell said in a statement. “We know that our hundreds of thousands of members and supporters expect a strong and resilient NAACP moving forward, as our organization has been in the past, and it remains our mission to ensure the advancement of communities of color in this country,”

Johnson said current president and CEO, Cornell W. Brooks, will end his position after nearly three years. Brooks will serve out his term in the Baltimore-based organization until his contract expires on June 30.

Russell and Johnson will run the organization during the search for a successor. They said there was no firm deadline to install new leadership. On the call with reporters, they declined to explain why they needed to remove Brooks.

“We are not looking to correct something that is wrong, we are looking to improve,” Russell said.

Brooks told American Urban Radio Networks on Friday that he was surprised by the decision and said he disagreed with it.

“The stated reason is that they are reimagining the NAACP. Beyond that, I can't point to any substantive reason,” he said. “What I can point to this: The NAACP over the course of the less than three years (he has been president) is more visible, more vocal, growing in members, donors, presence in the courts and in communities across the country.”

Brooks is known as a soft-spoken attorney with a history of working in civil rights organizations. Before the NAACP, he was president of the New Jersey Institute for Social Justice and executive director of the Fair Housing Council of Greater Washington.

His tenure at the NAACP included several court wins against state voting restrictions that group said discriminated against minorities. The group also filed a lawsuit against Michigan state officials over the water crisis in Flint.

More recently, Brooks was arrested during a sit-in this year at Mobile, Ala., office of then-Sen. Jeff Sessions as he protested Sessions' civil rights record ahead of his confirmation as attorney general. Among some NAACP members, the move was praised as a new turn for an organization better known for less aggressive tactics. But it was also criticized by others.

Some civil rights leaders said Friday they praised Brooks' civil rights record and the group's attempt to revamp itself.

“Cornell Brooks has been a strong partner in the racial justice movement and a great colleague. I've been proud to stand with him to resist and combat injustice,” said Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

Nekima Levy-Pounds, the former president of the Minneapolis chapter of the NAACP, said she was surprised by Brooks' ouster but was pleased to see the group pushing itself to adapt.

“I would like to see the NAACP be more nimble when it comes to civil rights challenges,” said Levy-Pounds, an attorney and leader in the Black Lives Matter movement, who is now campaigning for mayor of Minneapolis. “It was a challenge to be both an NAACP president and somebody who was engaged in the streets.”

Randolph M. McLaughlin, a law professor at Pace University who has studied civil rights movements, said he hoped the organization - founded in 1909 when Jim Crow was still rampant throughout the South - would thrive.

“It is critical that the NAACP has the most dynamic and creative activist leadership during the Trump era,” said McLaughlin. “The threats to civil rights and civil liberties demand no less from the oldest civil rights organization in the United States.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.