ShareThis Page

Scout wars: Boys accused of recruiting girls

| Wednesday, Aug. 23, 2017, 11:00 p.m.
Long plagued by declining membership, the Boy Scouts are considering a campaign to recruit in a previously ignored market: girls. The Girl Scouts aren’t having it.
Long plagued by declining membership, the Boy Scouts are considering a campaign to recruit in a previously ignored market: girls. The Girl Scouts aren’t having it.

Long plagued by declining membership, the Boy Scouts are considering a campaign to recruit in a previously ignored market: girls.

The Girl Scouts aren't having it.

A feud between the two largest Scouting organizations broke into the open Tuesday when the president of Girl Scouts of the USA called the Boy Scouts' “covert campaign” to recruit girls “reckless” and “unsettling” in a letter obtained by BuzzFeed News. A Girl Scouts spokesman confirmed the letter in an email to The Washington Post.

“We were disappointed in the lack of transparency as we learned that you are surreptitiously testing the appeal of a girls' offering to millennial parents,” Girl Scouts President Kathy Hopinkah Hannan wrote in her letter to Boy Scouts President Randall Stephenson. “Furthermore, it is inherently dishonest to claim to be a single-gender organization while simultaneously endeavoring upon a co-ed model.”

She said the Boy Scouts' “well documented” declining membership — its numbers have dwindled by a third since 2000, to just more than 2 million as of 2016 — is behind its push to include girls.

The Boy Scouts said in a statement to The Washington Post that they are considering including girls in their ranks not to boost their numbers but in response to requests from families who want their daughters to be a part of the same organization as their sons.

“The Boy Scouts of America believes in the benefit of single-gender programs,” said the statement from the Boy Scouts' director of national communications, Effie Delimarkos. “But in evaluating the possibility of serving the whole family, we've been having conversations with our members and volunteers to see how to make Scouting accessible for families.”

No decision on whether to include girls has been made, she said.

The ongoing discussion about girls' programs hasn't yet had much of an impact in Western Pennsylvania, said Daniel Sullivan, spokesman for the Boy Scouts of America Laurel Highlands Council, which represents troops in Pennsylvania, Maryland and West Virginia.

“Our national organization is having this conversation, and engaging with local councils and engaging with local folks on this decision, but so far those conversations have been mostly internal,” he said.

Declining membership hasn't been a recent problem for the Laurel Highlands region, according to Sullivan. The council serves about 17,000 scouts, and is expecting an uptick this year.

The Girl Scouts spokesman, explaining the letter, said the organization “believes in maintaining an open and honest dialogue with other organizations in the youth serving space. ... To that end we sent a professional letter” to the Boy Scouts, and look forward to “working out those issues with them in a mutually satisfactory manner.”

Girl Scouts' membership has also taken a hit in recent years, falling from its peak of more than 3.8 million in 2003 to 2.8 million in 2014.

“Girl Scouts is a proven, one-of-a-kind leadership experience for girls. Our program and methods are time-tested, well-researched and focused 100 percent on girls and their healthy development,” officials with Girl Scouts Western Pennsylvania wrote in a statement. “We have respect for the Boy Scouts' leadership, and look forward to GSUSA and Boy Scouts working out these issues in a mutually beneficial way.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.