ShareThis Page

Issue of race is again a focus in ex-cop's 4th murder trial

| Saturday, Oct. 7, 2017, 9:12 a.m.
In this Friday, June 30, 2017 file photo, ex-Tulsa police officer Shannon Kepler, left, arrives with his legal team for afternoon testimony in his trial in Tulsa, Okla. Kepler is headed for a fourth trial in less than a year in the 2014 fatal shooting of his daughter's black boyfriend.
In this Friday, June 30, 2017 file photo, ex-Tulsa police officer Shannon Kepler, left, arrives with his legal team for afternoon testimony in his trial in Tulsa, Okla. Kepler is headed for a fourth trial in less than a year in the 2014 fatal shooting of his daughter's black boyfriend.
In this Monday, July 13, 2015 file photo, Marq Lewis, of We The People, speaks with the media in Tulsa, Okla., Monday, July 13, 2015. Tulsa activist Marq Lewis with We the People Oklahoma said that defense attorneys in the trial of ex-Tulsa police officer Shannon Kepler have been booting potential jurors based on skin color. Kepler goes on trial for the fourth time in less than a year in the 2014 fatal shooting of his daughter's black boyfriend
In this Monday, July 13, 2015 file photo, Marq Lewis, of We The People, speaks with the media in Tulsa, Okla., Monday, July 13, 2015. Tulsa activist Marq Lewis with We the People Oklahoma said that defense attorneys in the trial of ex-Tulsa police officer Shannon Kepler have been booting potential jurors based on skin color. Kepler goes on trial for the fourth time in less than a year in the 2014 fatal shooting of his daughter's black boyfriend

TULSA, Okla. — Three hung juries in the case of a white former Oklahoma police officer charged with fatally shooting his daughter's black boyfriend had one thing in common besides unwillingness to convict: Each had only one African-American juror.

Race has been an undercurrent in ex-Tulsa officer Shannon Kepler's first-degree murder case, which is headed for a fourth trial. Criminal law experts and U.S. Supreme Court cases point to the importance of racial identity and policing when it comes to jury selection, which is set to start Monday.

Kepler, a 24-year veteran of the force, was off duty in August 2014 when he fatally shot 19-year-old Jeremey Lake, who had just started dating Kepler's daughter. Kepler doesn't deny pulling the trigger but says he did so only because he thought Lake was armed. No weapon was found on or near Lake's body.

Officers across the U.S. involved in fatal shootings of black residents have recently faced similar trials. In the past year alone — including in Tulsa — juries were unwilling to vote for a conviction or prosecutors were unwilling to charge officers in cases from Baltimore to St. Louis. In May, a jury acquitted now-former Tulsa officer Betty Jo Shelby in the killing of an unarmed black man, which roiled the city's black community.

“I don't see how race cannot play a role,” said Kris McDaniel-Miccio, a professor at Sturm College of Law at the University of Denver and a former Bronx-based prosecutor. “I don't think there's any way to get around it because of what has happened in this community.”

The racial makeup of the juries in Kepler's previous trials prompted criticism from at least one civil rights group.

Tulsa activist Marq Lewis with We the People Oklahoma said Kepler's defense attorneys have been booting potential jurors based on skin color.

“The last three juries somehow felt that Jeremey was a bad person because he was black,” Lewis said. “They couldn't bring themselves to believe this off-duty officer would literally shoot someone in cold blood without thinking somehow the black guy is sinister and he's done something bad.”

Richard O'Carroll, Kepler's defense attorney, has denied race played a role in Lake's killing. O'Carroll did not return messages this past week seeking comment on the case.

Tulsa County District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler declined to comment specifically on the racial makeup of the past juries, but acknowledged “frustration” with the results of the trials.

“I know I had citizens who put in a lot of effort and worked very hard and I know from their perspective they are frustrated as well,” Kunzweiler said.

Another racial element was recently added to the case when Kepler argued that he couldn't be tried by state prosecutors because he's a member of an American Indian tribe. A judge determined the fourth trial could move forward in state court. Kepler says he's 1128th Muscogee (Creek).

Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-1 that prosecutors violated the Constitution by excluding African-Americans from an all-white jury that convicted a black Georgia death row inmate of killing a white woman. The decision emphasized rules set by the court in 1986 to prevent racial discrimination in jury selection.

Seating more jurors of color — especially in cases involving police who have fatally shot people — could be a factor in how a jury ultimately votes, said Bridgette Baldwin, professor of law at Western New England University in Springfield, Massachusetts.

“The life experience is different,” said Baldwin, who is black. “I may not be scared of a young male with a hoodie on because I've been socialized to be around these types of individuals. You see things differently, you hear things differently, you process things differently.”

McDaniel-Miccio, the Denver law professor, said the Kepler case illustrates what the U.S. is trying to address when it comes to race, police and the justice system.

“How many generations do we have to have pass before we come to the honest realization that there is a distinct racial and ethnic asymmetry in this country?” she said. “We live in a world where we should believe that when something like this happens, they will be facing justice and they will be held accountable if they broke the law — no more, no less.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.