ShareThis Page

Indiana woman gets 40 years in malnourished baby's death

| Friday, Nov. 10, 2017, 11:00 a.m.

LAFAYETTE, Ind. — A western Indiana woman has been sentenced to 40 years in prison for the neglect death of her malnourished 8-month-old daughter, who weighed just 11 pounds when she died.

Makenzie Shultz, 23, was also ordered to spend four years on supervised probation following her release from prison. The Lafayette woman was convicted in September on seven charges, including neglect resulting in death and failure to report a dead body.

A coroner found that Briley Giroux was emaciated, dehydrated and malnourished, and had died several hours before she was taken to a hospital in November 2015. The baby, who died from asphyxiation, had not been fed for several days before her death.

Court testimony indicated Briley slept in a closet where blankets and clothes were piled on top of her to muffle her cries.

Tippecanoe County Judge Randy Williams said during Shultz's Wednesday sentencing that although her baby was malnourished, police found unopened baby food items inside the home following her death.

“Briley, from everything we saw and heard, was never given a chance,” Williams said.

Briley's father, Chad A. Giroux Jr., took her lifeless body to a Lafayette hospital on Nov. 16, 2015. He pleaded guilty to charges that include neglect of a dependent resulting in death and obstruction of justice.

Giroux was sentenced in March to 35 years in prison, but online court records show that he appealed his sentence in September.

After Briley's death, prosecutors said Shultz and Giroux took steps to conceal potential evidence, including several computer hard drives and bags of baby clothes and other items.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.