ShareThis Page

Mailing quirk has Missouri residents with Iowa addresses

| Friday, Nov. 24, 2017, 10:45 p.m.
In this Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, photo, packages wait to be sorted in a Post Office as U.S. Postal Service letter carrier Michael McDonald, gathers mail to load into his truck before making his delivery run, in Atlanta.
AP Photo/David Goldman
In this Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, photo, packages wait to be sorted in a Post Office as U.S. Postal Service letter carrier Michael McDonald, gathers mail to load into his truck before making his delivery run, in Atlanta.

ST. LOUIS — For decades, an idiosyncrasy in the mail delivery system has forced some rural northern Missouri residents to have Iowa mailing addresses, which has created roadblocks and red tape for residents when they vote or pay taxes — even when they die.

Local officials have been asking for help for years from local politicians and postal officials to no avail. U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill recently learned about the quirk, calling it “one of the dumbest things I've come across.”

McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat, sent a letter this week to Postmaster General Megan J. Brennan, asking that the U.S. Postal Service “take immediate action” on behalf of Missouri residents who have Iowa mailing addresses. Brennan's spokesman David Partenheimer said in a statement this week that his agency is “working with the senator to address this issue and will respond directly to her office.” He declined further comment.

The exact number of affected residents is unknown, though one county has more than two dozen misaddressed residents. Also unclear is why Missouri residents were assigned Iowa postal addresses in the first place. McCaskill's letter said it appears to have something to do with mail delivery routes along the sparsely populated area where the two states come together, though local residents were never given a good explanation.

In Missouri's Clark County, some residents launched a petition drive this summer to get address changes because the county of 6,700 residents is adopting a new 911 system and accurate addresses are crucial, said Jena Church, the county clerk.

The quirk also makes voter registration difficult because Iowa addresses aren't recognized in Missouri's voting system.

“We always put their address as the courthouse address,” Church said of the 30 or so Clark County residents with Iowa addresses. “It has to be a Missouri address to have a voting district.”

In other cases, residents have been required to file provisional ballots, Church said.

Problems extend to other areas, too. Church said the address issue can create a headache in filing taxes: Several of the affected Missouri residents have been told by the state of Iowa they should be filing returns to Iowa because of their addresses. The two-state confusion can also slow the process of obtaining a death certificate and even make it more difficult to collect life insurance after a relative has died, Church said.

McCaskill asked Brennan to provide her with a history of the issue, including the year Iowa addresses were assigned to Missouri residents. She also asked for a dedicated Postal Service employee to be appointed to resolve the problem and work with residents who have Iowa addresses but live in the Missouri counties of Atchison, Mercer, Putnam, Schuyler, Scotland and Clark.

“The notion that Missouri residents have faced numerous hassles for decades because they have an Iowa mailing address is one of the dumbest things I've come across,” McCaskill said. “This needs to get fixed, and I plan on doing everything I can to help.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.