ShareThis Page

Pearl Harbor: Memorial tweeting 'live' account of attack timeline

Renatta Signorini
| Thursday, Dec. 7, 2017, 8:06 a.m.
The U.S. Navy battleship USS Arizona burns during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on Dec. 7, 1941.
REUTERS
The U.S. Navy battleship USS Arizona burns during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on Dec. 7, 1941.

In a clash of history and modern-day social media, a Twitter account for the USS Arizona is tweeting the news of 'a date which will life in infamy' — Dec. 7, 1941.

The USS Arizona was bombed in a surprise Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, exploded and sank, trapping more than 1,000 men inside. Just before 8 a.m., hundreds of fighter planes descended on the U.S. naval base, killing 2,400 civilians and military members and damaging or destroying battleships, airplanes and other vessels. Another 1,000 people were injured.

Now, the USS Arizona is a memorial in Hawaii, about 4,000 miles from Japan. The attack there sparked the United States' involvement in World War II. The memorial is essentially 'live-tweeting' an account of the events there 76 years ago, starting with a quiet evening on Dec. 6, 1941 and following through the morning of the attack. The time difference between Hawaii and Western Pennsylvania is five hours.

Follow along here: https://twitter.com/USSArizona

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-837-5374, rsignorini@tribweb.com or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.