ShareThis Page
World

FBI warns about online romance scams

| Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, 10:12 a.m.

As Valentine's Day approaches, the FBI has a warning for people looking for love in online places — the agency received nearly 15,000 complaints about romance scams in 2016 and the losses associated with those complaints was more than $230 million.

That comes out to more than $15,300 per broken heart, but some victims have lost considerably more. In a local case , an online swindler conned eight women out of more than $800,000 and in a Texas case highlighted by the FBI, a woman lost $2 million.

Pennsylvania was one of five states with the most victims in 2016. The others were California, Texas, Florida and New York.

The scams often follow a predictable pattern, and being alert to that pattern can help people avoid becoming victims.

The criminals, who are often overseas, will steal or manufacture an identity and then troll dating and social media sites. They'll often approach multiple people at the same time to see which ones respond.

They'll have a reason they can't meet in person, usually business in another state or overseas. They will invent a business or customs problem and ask for financial help to resolve, often claiming that once it's resolved they can quickly repay the money and finally meet with the victim in person.

FBI tips for detecting online romance scams

 

The FBI provides tips for detecting this kind of fraud. In general, the advice is to be wary of anyone you've never met in person who is asking for money.

If you suspect an online relationship is a scam, the FBI recommends cutting off all contact immediately. The agency urges victims of romance scams to file a complaint with its Internet Crime Complaint Center .

Brian Bowling is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1218, bbowling@tribweb.com or via Twitter @TribBrian.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me