ShareThis Page
World

Jeff Sessions faces accusations of racism after lauding policing's 'Anglo-American heritage'

| Monday, Feb. 12, 2018, 6:21 p.m.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions holds up a gift given to him following his address to the National Sheriffs' Association Winter Conference on law enforcement efforts to combat the opioid crisis and violent crime, in Washington, Monday, Feb. 12, 2018. The box contains the associations badge and challenge coin.
Associated Press
Attorney General Jeff Sessions holds up a gift given to him following his address to the National Sheriffs' Association Winter Conference on law enforcement efforts to combat the opioid crisis and violent crime, in Washington, Monday, Feb. 12, 2018. The box contains the associations badge and challenge coin.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions made a racially charged slip of the tongue Monday, telling a room full of police officials that sheriff's offices across the country are "a critical part of the Anglo-American heritage of law enforcement."

The 71-year-old attorney general made the off-color remark while addressing the National Sheriffs Association winter meeting in Washington, D.C.

"Since our founding, the independently elected sheriff has been the people's protector, who keeps law enforcement close to and accountable to people through the elected process," Sessions told the assembled sheriffs. "The office of sheriff is a critical part of the Anglo-American heritage of law enforcement."

"We must never erode this historic office," Sessions added.

The "Anglo-American heritage" reference raised some eyebrows, especially considering previous accusations of racism Sessions has faced.

"Under any other administration, I'd call this an innocuous historical footnote; in the current context, my 'benefit of the doubt' reserves are pretty well depleted," tweeted Julian Sanchez, a senior fellow at the libertarian-leaning Cato Institute.

Sessions' comment appears to have been made off the cuff, as a written version of his remarks reveals that he was supposed to say, "The sheriff is a critical part of our legal heritage."

Ian Prior, a spokesman for the Justice Department, pushed back against suggestions that Sessions' remark carried racial undertones.

"As most law students learn in the first week of their first year, Anglo-American law — also known as the common law — is a shared legal heritage between England and America," Prior told the New York Daily News in a statement. "Before reporters sloppily imply nefarious meaning behind the term, we would suggest that they read any number of the Supreme Court opinions that use the term."

Prior pointed to a number of cases in which the phrase "Anglo-American law" has been used by legal scholars. But in most of those cases, the phrase was typically used in a legal context, not in a law enforcement context.

Sessions faced an avalanche of scrutiny before he was approved as attorney general by the Senate over racist remarks he allegedly made decades ago.

Sessions was once denied a federal judgeship in his native Alabama over allegations that he had referred to a black co-worker as "boy." He was also once accused of joking that he had no problem with the KKK until he learned that some of its members smoked marijuana.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me