Broadened Russia law concerns advocates of dissent
MOSCOW — Adding to fears that the Kremlin aims to stifle dissent, Russians now live under a new law expanding the definition of treason so broadly that critics say it could be used to call anyone who bucks the government a traitor.
The law took effect on Wednesday, just two days after President Vladimir Putin told his human rights advisory council that he was ready to review it. His spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Russian news agencies that Putin would be willing to review the treason law if its implementation reveals “some problems or aspects restricting rights and freedoms.”
But what Putin might consider a problem is unclear. His opponents say a series of measures enacted since Putin returned to the Kremlin in May for a third term show he is determined to intimidate and suppress dissidents.
One measure imposes a huge increase in potential fines for participants in unauthorized demonstrations. Another requires non-governmental organizations to register as foreign agents if they both receive money from abroad and engage in political activity. And another gives sweeping power to authorities to ban websites under a procedure critics denounce as opaque.
After fraud-tainted parliamentary elections last December, an unprecedented wave of protest arose, with some demonstrations attracting as many as 100,000 people. Putin still won the March presidential election handily, but the protests boldly challenged his image as the strongman Russia needs to achieve stability and prosperity.
Under the law, anyone who without authorization possesses information deemed a state secret — whether a politician, a journalist, an environmentalist or a union leader — could potentially be jailed for up to 20 years for espionage.
While the previous law described high treason as espionage or other assistance to a foreign state that damages Russia's external security, the new legislation expands the definition by dropping the word “external.” Activities that fall under it include providing help or advice to a foreign state or giving information to an international or foreign organization.
The definition is so broad that rights advocates say it could be used as a driftnet to sweep up all inconvenient figures.
“I believe this law is very dangerous,” said human rights council member Liliya Shibanova, according to the ITAR-Tass news agency. Shibanova also heads Golos, Russia's only independent elections watchdog group.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Saudi King Salman vows retribution for suicide attack on mosque
- New parties shake up politics around Spain
- Women’s walk across Koreas’ DMZ denied; they cross by bus
- Malaysian authorities find mass graves, link them to human trafficking
- Officials claim world duty to Mideast at international forum
- Chlorine gas attacks in Syria blamed on Assad
- China orders U.S. plane to divert from airspace over islands in South China Sea
- Dozens dead in gunfight on Mexico ranch
- Army commando team kills senior Islamic State official in Syria raid
- Secretary of State Kerry to reassure South Korea on security
- Lawmakers question long-term use of raids on terrorists