India: 2 troops slain by Pakistan
NEW DELHI — Indian military officials on Tuesday accused Pakistani troops of killing two of their soldiers and mutilating the body of at least one of them after crossing into Indian territory in the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir, a development that could impede a tenuous peace process between the nuclear-armed rivals.
The charge came two days after Pakistan accused India of killing one of its soldiers along the Line of Control, the de facto border where a fragile cease-fire has held for almost a decade.
Indian Defense Ministry spokesman Lt. Col. Rajesh Kalia said in a statement that the alleged incident was “a significant escalation” of cease-fire violations by Pakistan and would be addressed “sternly” through official channels.
A senior Indian army official said that the body of one soldier killed in a firefight after the incursion had been badly mutilated and that the condition of the other remained unconfirmed. Some reports, citing military officials, said the head was missing from at least one of the bodies.
“This is not something of a very slight nature that you can bypass or ignore easily,” Foreign Minister Salman Khursheed told the Indian news channel NDTV 24X7. “It causes a tremendous amount of hurt to us. This is not the way that civilized people deal with each other, even if they have serious differences.”
A Pakistani army spokesman denied that Pakistani soldiers had been involved in an unprovoked shooting, the Associated Press reported, adding that the Pakistani military had said in a statement that the Indian accusation “looks like Indian propaganda” to divert attention after the Sunday incident.
The border in Kashmir - a mountainous region that has been the cause of two wars between India and Pakistan — has been relatively calm in the past year, despite a handful of minor cease-fire violations, officials said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.