Court denies Berlusconi's bid to halt sex-for-hire trial
MILAN — A Milan court on Monday rejected a bid by former Premier Silvio Berlusconi to halt his sex-for-hire trial for Italy's general election campaign, a ruling that makes a verdict likely before the February vote.
Berlusconi's lawyer accused the court of ‘‘interfering heavily” in the Italian political campaign by refusing to suspend the trial so Berlusconi can dedicate himself to campaigning for his center-right coalition.
‘‘A verdict will most certainly come before the election. It seems to me this is the clear intent of the court,” said defense lawyer Niccolo Ghedini. ‘‘It doesn't bother us, but it should bother citizens since it is obvious that it will impact the electoral campaign.”
Berlusconi denounced the trial as ‘‘a comedy, a farce, a defamatory hoax,” in an interview with Sky TG24.
Prosecutors accused Ghedini of merely seeking to delay a verdict in the nearly 2-year-old trial, which started when Berlusconi was in office. He resigned about seven months later, making room for Mario Monti's technical government, as the sovereign debt crisis threatened to engulf Italy.
Despite his legal woes and sex scandal, Berlusconi's coalition has been gaining in the polls since he actively began campaigning.
Berlusconi, 76, has been boosted by combative televised debates with journalistic critics.
Berlusconi is accused of having paid for sex with a Moroccan woman, Karima el-Mahroug, when she was 17, during racy ‘‘bunga bunga” parties with attractive young women at his villa near Milan, and then using his influence to cover it up.
He and el-Mahroug have denied sexual relations.
Berlusconi has apologized for hosting the parties, saying he was lonely after splitting from his second wife. Veronica Laria left him in 2009, citing alleged dalliances with young women.
El-Mahrough, 20, better known as Ruby, made her first appearance in court on Monday, where she was called by the defense to testify. The court had ordered her to return from a trip abroad and fined her $270 because she had failed twice to show up. But Berlusconi's lawyers changed their strategy and decided to renounce her testimony, saying they wanted to ‘‘avoid another development in the trial that interferes with the serenity of the election campaign.”
The prosecution did not include el-Mahroug on its witness list, instead relying on her testimony during the investigation and other evidence to make their case.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.