French prepare to battle Islamists in Mali
By The Washington Post
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2013, 8:40 p.m.
BAMAKO, Mali— French troops surrounded the desert village of Diabaly in central Mali on Wednesday, the first direct engagement since France began a military assault last week to oust radical Islamists who have advanced to within 250 miles of the capital.
The escalation set the stage for a perilous ground conflict. In waging ground combat, France is entering the comfort zone of the rebels, who know the desert terrain and are veterans of guerrilla warfare. They have melded into the local population, occupied houses and are hiding in mango groves to stage ambushes, residents said by telephone.
“The jihadists are mixing with the people, moving around in small groups of five,” said Salif Ouedraogo, an aid worker. “They are preventing people from leaving Diabaly. They want to use the people as human shields.”
What began as a campaign of aerial assaults appears to be expanding into a ground war, raising questions about France's military capability and political will to defeat the Islamists, a meld of al-Qaida militants, religious zealots and criminals who seized a Texas-sized territory in northern Mali in March.
While French forces have had experience combating guerrillas recently in Afghanistan, they have not played the lead role in a counter-insurgency campaign since its colonial days.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Study: Afghan copter choice not best
- India’s governing party trounced in state elections
- Egypt strikes a perilous repose
- Bolshoi dancer sentenced to prison
- Central African leader says he lacks control of ex-allies
- South Africans of all races, backgrounds pray for Mandela
- North Korea purges Kim Jong Un’s powerful uncle
- Egypt orders blogger’s arrest
- Robert Gumbita retains Mt. Pleasant School Board president seat
- NATO says Karzai failure to sign pact would end Afghan mission
- Lebanese army taking over in second-largest city