Russian official backs ban on U.S. adoptions
MOSCOW — Russia's children's ombudsman vigorously endorsed the ban on U.S. adoptions on Thursday, saying there was no chance it would be lifted, no matter how large the protest. However, the 50 or so American families who have received court decisions will be able to take their children home, he said.
In a combative news conference, Pavel Astakhov, the ombudsman, said he has been opposed to U.S. adoptions ever since 2010, when a Tennessee woman put her 7-year-old alone on a plane bound for Moscow accompanied only by a note saying she was returning him because he was violent and unstable.
“We must stop selling our children,” he said.
But he repeatedly said the families with court decrees can take their children, even though regional officials have apparently been refusing to finish the adoptions. “We are talking about 52 families,” he said, “maybe more, maybe less.”
He conceded that some of those families have been denied the final paperwork and promised to intervene personally in those cases.
“Judges are afraid; employees of migration offices are afraid,” he said. “Everyone's afraid. That's the reality, unfortunately.”
The ban, enacted by Russia's legislature in December and signed by President Vladimir Putin, has devastated American families who wanted to adopt. It has unleashed considerable furor among Russians, with tens of thousands marching in protest of the ban on Sunday.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Syrian tomb towers latest cultural icons to be wiped out in terrorist rampage
- 45 UAE troops die in Yemen explosion
- Migrant surge: Europe ill-prepared for invasion of foreigners
- Pope: Priests in Holy Year can absolve ‘sin of abortion’
- Ayatollah: Iran won’t settle for ‘suspension’
- Migrant-laden train makes unexpected stop
- 200 feared dead in latest migrant disaster off Libya’s coast
- Vatican priest accused of child sex abuse found dead
- Japan law to implement mandate for hiring of women
- Al-Jazeera English journalists head to prison in Egypt
- Temple in ancient Syrian city of Palmyra bombed by ISIS terrorists