Vatican supports Obama gun proposals
VATICAN CITY — The Vatican on Saturday praised President Obama's proposals for curbing gun violence, saying they are a “step in a right direction.”
The Vatican's chief spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said 47 religious leaders have appealed to members of the Congress “to limit firearms that are making society pay an unacceptable price in terms of massacres and senseless deaths.”
“I am with them,” Lombardi said in an editorial carried on Vatican Radio, lining up the Vatican's moral support in favor of firearm limits.
‘‘The initiatives announced by the American administration for limiting and controlling the spread and use of weapons are certainly a step in the right direction,” Lombardi said.
Obama is trying to rally support for reinstating a ban on assault rifles and requiring background checks on all gun sales. He faces stiff opposition in the Congress and from powerful gun lobbies.
Considering that Americans possess ‘‘about 300 million firearms,” Lombardi said, ‘‘people cannot fool themselves that it is enough to limit the number and use (of guns) to impede in the future horrendous massacres like that of Newtown that shook the conscience of America and world, as well as that of children and adults.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Peruvian nurse cares for 175 terminally ill cats
- Hamas insists terrorist leader still alive despite Israeli barrage
- Social media being used to help catch British terrorist who killed Foley
- Bombed factories in Gaza raise ire
- Liberian slum sealed off as Ebola deaths mount
- N. Korea aims for Kerry’s jaw as string of insults continues
- Neanderthals, humans may have mingled, study finds
- Ukrainian troops regaining control
- Landslide in Japan leaves dozens dead
- Jihadists taunting Americans while experts say attack threat is real
- Islamic State fighters massacre as many as 700 Syrian tribesmen, activists report