| USWorld

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Court rulings dim outlook for Gitmo trials

Email Newsletters

Sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Associated Press
Sunday, Jan. 27, 2013, 9:06 p.m.

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — A civilian appeals court has reversed the verdicts of the only two Guantanamo Bay prisoners convicted in trials by military tribunal, casting a shadow over proceedings set to resume this week at the U.S. base in Cuba for the men accused in the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.

A federal appeals court on Friday threw out the military commission conviction of Ali Hamza al-Bahlul, who was charged with providing material support to terrorism and conspiracy for making propaganda videos for al-Qaida. That followed the dismissal in October of the conviction of Salim Hamdan, a driver for Osama bin Laden.

Al-Bahlul and Hamdan were the only prisoners convicted in a trial by the tribunals known as a military commission. The five other convictions of Guantanamo prisoners came through plea bargains.

There are two pending death penalty cases at Guantanamo: one against a prisoner accused of orchestrating the attack on the USS Cole in 2000, the other against five men accused of planning and aiding the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But the reversals have raised new questions about the use of military commissions in complex terrorism cases.

“The fact that no conviction can stand up on appeal does not bode well for the military commission system,” said James Connell, a lawyer for Ammar al-Baluchi, a Pakistani who is one of the five charged in the Sept. 11 attacks.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Friday overturned al-Bahlul's November 2008 conviction. In October, the court overturned Hamdan's August 2008 conviction. In both cases, the reasoning was the same.

The court determined that before enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which authorized the tribunals for the terrorism suspects at Guantanamo, only violations of the international law of war and pre-existing federal offenses were subject to trial by military commission, a special court for wartime offenses. The court said the charges of material support for terrorism and conspiracy did not meet that standard.

The Justice Department let the deadline to appeal the Hamdan ruling expire, perhaps because he has already been released after serving his 5-year sentence and is back home in Yemen. But the government said it disagreed with the ruling in court papers and is likely to challenge the al-Bahlul ruling.

A Pentagon spokesman, Army Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, said “the al-Bahlul ruling has no bearing on the substantive merits,” of the Sept. 11 case, which will be the subject of a four-day pretrial hearing scheduled to start on Monday.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read World

  1. EU expects ‘immediate’ clampdown on migrants in $3.2B deal with Turkey
  2. Senators call for 20,000 more troops in Syria and Iraq
  3. Pope Francis appeals for peace amid tight security in Central African Republic
  4. A third of world’s cacti threatened with extinction, report says
  5. Norway mulls using medical heroin to prevent deadly overdoses
  6. Israel suspends contact with some EU groups over labels on exports
  7. Iran gives investors glimpse of $30 billion in oil deals to come
  8. Pakistani doctor who led CIA to bin Laden stuck in prison
  9. France, Russia iron out alliance against Islamic State
  10. Testing of Tut’s tomb hints at hidden chamber
  11. China to reorganize military under joint command