Scottish police head to Libya for 1st time
TRIPOLI — Scottish police continuing their probe into the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie will visit Libya for the first time, Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron announced on Thursday.
Officers from the Dumfries and Galloway force in Scotland will be granted visas by Libya to meet with officials and discuss the next steps in their investigation.
Cameron met with Libya's Prime Minister Ali Zaidan after talks in Tripoli on Thursday.
“We are delighted,” Cameron said. “The Dumfries and Galloway police team are now able to visit. In all these cases, what I want to achieve is justice.”
Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi, the sole Libyan convicted of the attack, died at his home in Tripoli last year — three years after being released from a Scottish prison on medical grounds and returning to Libya to a hero's welcome. Some of the victims' families remain unconvinced of his guilt.
The bombing, which followed a number of other attacks blamed on Libya, including a 1986 blast at a Berlin disco, largely cemented the country's pariah status in the world community under Moammar Gadhafi's rule. Gadhafi was ousted in 2011 by rebels backed by Britain and other western countries in 2011. He was killed the same year.
The bombing of the jetliner killed 259 passengers and crew members, plus 11 residents of Lockerbie. Among the dead were 189 Americans, including Beth Ann Johnson of Hempfield; Elyse Saraceni, daughter of Gene and Iva Saraceni of Salem Township; Army Maj. Charles McKee of Trafford; and University of Pittsburgh professor David Gould of Squirrel Hill.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.