Share This Page

Syrian opposition blasts Assad inaction on Israel

| Friday, Feb. 1, 2013, 7:09 p.m.

Syrian opposition leaders and rebels on Friday slammed President Bashar Assad for not responding to a rare Israeli airstrike near Damascus, calling it proof of his weakness and acquiescence to the Jewish state.

The opposition's sharp reaction underlines that those seeking to topple the Syrian leader might be more prepared to tangle with Israel if they came to power.

The Israeli airstrike on Wednesday, which U.S. officials said hit a convoy of anti-aircraft weapons bound for the militant Lebanese Hezbollah group, has fueled rage among Syrians who fear warplanes from Assad's forces and from Israel.

“Assad never once in his life stood up to Israel,” said Kamal Labwani, a prominent Syrian dissident and member of the Syrian National Coalition. “All he ever did is ‘reserve the right to retaliate,' but he never retaliated against anyone other than the Syrian people and the Free Syrian Army.”

Syria's army chief of staff, Gen. Ali Abdullah Ayoub, warned on Friday against testing his country's capabilities.

That was a day after Syria's ambassador to Lebanon, Ali Abdul-Karim Ali, said Damascus “has the option and the capacity” to retaliate, but that it was up to the relevant authorities to choose the time and place.

Up to now, the Jewish state has refrained from actions that could be interpreted as intervention in Syria's civil war. The Syrian government's response to the airstrike has been viewed as passive, and most Syrians said they did not expect their military to retaliate.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.