Libyans try to sort out Benghazi attack
By McClatchy Newspapers
Published: Monday, Feb. 4, 2013, 8:14 p.m.
The attackers who killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in September in Benghazi, Libya, represented a variety of Islamist groups and were motivated by myriad factors, the top Libyan official investigating the case told McClatchy Newspapers.
They almost certainly included members of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, the North Africa affiliate of al-Qaida, Army Gen. Carter Ham, the head of the U.S. military's Africa Command, said in a separate interview. The French are battling the Islamic Maghreb in northern Mali.
The descriptions of what took place underscore the complexity of the threat posed by restive Islamist groups that suddenly found space to grow after the collapse of the government of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi. Gadhafi was killed by Libyan rebels in October 2011 after a months-long NATO-led bombing campaign.
“I believe there are individuals who participated in the attacks in Benghazi who had at least some affiliation with AQIM,” Ham said. “I don't interpret from that that this was AQIM-directed or even an AQIM-inspired or -supported effort. But the connection is there. And I think that what I am wrestling with is: What is the connection with all these various individuals or groups?”
Col. Abdel Salem Ashour, who heads the Libyan Interior Ministry's criminal investigations department, said he thought the attack was hastily planned by smaller groups whose membership comprised different nationalities. He said the attack wasn't well-organized, but with the Libyan government essentially without forces in eastern Libya, it didn't need to be.
“Islamist groups have their own agendas, and they have the ability to gather and mobilize. They exploit the lack of security,” he said.
Ashour said the case had been turned over to a judge in Tripoli, suggesting that suspects have been identified. But he emphasized that nearly five months after the attack, no arrests have been made.
The assault has spurred several U.S. congressional investigations into why the two American compounds in Benghazi, one of which generally is referred to as the consulate and the other of which housed the CIA station in eastern Libya, were so poorly defended. Stevens and State Department computer expert Sean Smith died when the consulate was overrun and set on fire. Two former Navy SEALs who were working as security contractors for the CIA, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, died hours later when the attackers fired mortar rounds at the CIA compound.
Outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are scheduled to testify on Thursday before the Senate Armed Services committee about security measures leading up to the attack and the military response immediately afterward.
How to anticipate attacks when so many groups may be involved is a challenge, Ham said. It's unclear how many groups exist in the ungoverned reaches of eastern Libya and in other parts of North Africa, including northern Mali. The links between the groups are also unclear, though it's certain that weapons are being passed from Libya to northern Mali and Egypt, Ham said.
Determining what motivated the Benghazi attack is one issue that Ham and Libyan investigators are still struggling with.
Ham and Ashour said they thought that anger over the killing of a top al-Qaida official, Abu Yahya al-Libi, by a U.S. drone strike in Pakistan was one factor. Al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri had confirmed al-Libi's death in a video aired the day before the Benghazi attack.
“There are some indications that was part of the motivation for some of those who participated in the attack. Whether it was the compelling reason or not, I think, is hard to say,” Ham said.
At the same time, protests had broken out in Egypt hours before the assault over an inflammatory video produced by Egyptian exiles living in the United States that insulted the Prophet Muhammad. Ashour said that was the motivation for smaller groups that planned the attack on the consulate.
“Each group used (the assault) for its own interests,” Ashour said. “One used it for the film and another used it for the leader that was killed. And there were other thieves who used it for the sake of stealing.”
Ham acknowledged that the fall of Gadhafi played a role in creating space for many Islamist groups to thrive.
“When the Gadhafi regime collapsed, and there was, essentially, for a period of time no governmental control, it was in that environment that extremist organizations and criminal organizations took advantage of that situation to establish themselves and in some cases re-establish themselves,” Ham said.
He said he was optimistic that the Libyan government would be able to exert control eventually.
“It's probably premature to say the expansion of extremist groups has been arrested,” he said. “But this is going to be difficult.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Crimean vote called illegal
- Syrian rebels struggle to resist Assad’s onslaught
- Libya extradites son of Gadhafi
- Pistorius recalled as frantic, faithful moments after shooting
- Sedition charges possible for Kashmir fans of Pakistani cricket team
- Al-Qaida kills one of own for spying, flaunts body
- Syria breeds crop of jihadis
- Separatists blamed for China knife attack; 33 dead
- Terrorists attack Pakistan court, killing 11
- 16,000 Russian troops spill into Ukraine
- Upon closer look, Ukraine a tricky target