British Academy loves 'Argo,' 'Skyfall'
LONDON — Iran-hostage drama “Argo” continued its journey from awards-season outsider to favorite Sunday, winning three prizes, including best picture, at the British Academy Film Awards.
Ben Affleck, named best director for the based-on-reality story of a longshot plan to rescue a group of American diplomats from Iran, dedicated his directing prize for “anyone out there who's trying to get their second act.”
“Skyfall” was a surprise win for best British film. It was the first award for the 007 franchise since 1963, when it received a nod for cinematography for “From Russia With Love.”
Aside from that, the Bond films received 42 nominations over the past 50 years, largely for technical awards rather than the more glamorous acting or best film categories.
Skyfall also received the award for best original music.
“We all had high expectations for this film, and this is really the icing on the cake,” director Sam Mendes said.
Daniel Day-Lewis won his universally expected best-actor trophy for “Lincoln” — the only prize out of 10 nominations for Steven Spielberg's biopic.
Day-Lewis paid tribute to his fellow nominees, who included Affleck, Bradley Cooper, Hugh Jackman and Joaquin Phoenix.
“I don't know if I deserve this, but I do know that every single one of you deserve it at least every bit as I do,” he said.
Emmanuelle Riva, the 85-year-old French film legend, was named best actress for her poignant portrait of old age in “Amour.” It was named best foreign-language film.
“Les Miserables” won four prizes, including best supporting actress for Anne Hathaway.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.