Russians collect, study meteorites
MOSCOW — Russian scientists said on Monday they had established the composition of the meteorite that exploded over the Chelyabinsk region last week, injuring hundreds of people and causing millions of dollars worth of damage.
Over the weekend, scientists collected 53 tiny pieces of dark porous material recovered by local residents near Chebarkul Lake, 60 miles west of Chelyabinsk, officials said. The biggest of the finds was 7 millimeters long.
Not everyone who found the objects turned them in, apparently: Some enterprising locals were offering what they claimed to be fresh meteorite pieces for sale online for as much as $10,000 per piece. Some attributed far-reaching (if bogus) powers to the space rocks.
“Improves male potency, reduces weight,” one ad claimed. “Trade in for a car or real estate a possibility.”
The pieces collected by scientists were described as bits of chondrite, a type of stony meteorite, which contained at least 10 percent metallic iron and nickel alloy as well as chrysolite and sulfite, according to Viktor Grokhovsky, a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences meteorite committee.
Russian scientists also said they had submitted a proposal to the government for an early-warning system for space threats. Scientists put the cost at almost $2 billion during the next decade, said Lidiya Rykhlova, a senior researcher with the Institute of Astronomy.
The meteorite, estimated at 55 feet wide and 10,000 tons, exploded in the atmosphere on Friday with the power of several nuclear bombs. Shock waves shattered more than 1 million square feet of window glass, local officials said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Scientists snatch giant opportunity
- Convict’s wish for assisted suicide OK’d in Belgium
- Landmark Ukraine, EU deal ratified
- Nominees for 2 Iraqi ministries rejected
- Poll: ‘No’ leads ‘yes’ in a close Scotland vote on independence from United Kingdom
- 3 troops killed in Taliban strike in Afghanistan
- 2,900 African migrants killed this year on Mediterranean Sea
- Scotland urged to remain in United Kingdom
- Ukraine plan would give rebels self-rule to end fighting
- Suspects in Malala shooting caught
- Outraged Chinese fight ‘fake beef’