Iran, world powers admit scant chance of progress in nuclear talks
It's been eight months since they last met, but negotiators representing Iran and six leading industrial powers acknowledged Monday that they may have little new to say to each other when the two sides gather for talks about Iran's nuclear future.
Negotiations on proposed limits for Iran's nuclear program are set to begin on Tuesday in Almaty, Kazakhstan, where expectations were nearly as low as the frigid temperatures in the former Kazakh capital city. In public comments over the past week, U.S. and Iranian officials alike insisted the onus was on the other side to make key concessions that could lead to a nuclear deal.
Obama administration officials have set a low bar, expressing hopes only that the Almaty meeting will yield cordial engagement and an agreement to hold further talks in the spring and summer. One senior U.S. official, briefing reporters on the eve of the talks, said small steps this week could lead to a breakthrough in the future.
“If Iran engages with us tomorrow and begins to discuss the concrete steps they will take . . . we can move forward,” said the official, who insisted on anonymity. “They can get to where they want to go.”
Iranian politicians, meanwhile, have urged the country's negotiators to concede nothing on Iran's key demand: international recognition of the country's right to develop its nuclear infrastructure, including the capacity to enrich uranium. A statement issued on Sunday by the Iranian parliament warned against compromising on Iran's “inalienable nuclear rights.”
“We propose that the United States and its Western allies accept the Islamic Republic of Iran's nuclear realities and change their policy of confrontation to interaction,” the statement said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ebola claims hero doctor in Sierra Leone
- Shelling adds to mounting civilian toll in Ukraine
- Karzai’s kin killed in suicide bombing
- Reports include ‘aliens’ as origin of Russian holes
- Real-life ‘Ratatouille’ invade garden of Louvre
- Gaza’s only power plant taken out; utility official says attack ‘catastrophic’ for 1.8 million
- ‘Clear-cut’ path made to jetliner