NAIROBI, Kenya — Kenya's presidential race tightened late Thursday as new results pushed the leading candidate below the crucial 50 percent mark needed to win outright.
A final result is expected on Friday, but the close race and a troubled vote count are fueling fears of the kind of violence that gripped the country after its last national election.
Tensions rose as the political coalition led by Kenya's prime minister, currently running second, alleged that some vote results have been doctored and called for a stop to a tallying process it said “lacked integrity.”
The statement by Raila Odinga's coalition said the counting process should be restarted using primary documents from polling stations, but the election commission insisted there was no way to doctor the results.
Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta had a small lead over Odinga, though crucially Kenyatta for the first time slipped below the 50 percent threshold that would give him a clean win.
Kenyatta and running mate William Ruto face charges in the International Criminal Court for their alleged involvement in directing post-election violence five years ago. The court announced that the start of Kenyatta's trial would be delayed from April until July.
Kenya's national vote on Monday was the first since the 2007 election sparked tribe-on-tribe attacks that killed more than 1,000 people. Minor protests have cropped up, but no large-scale rioting or ethnic violence has occurred.
As time passes without a final result, though, tensions are rising, sparking fears that the dam now holding back potential protests could break.
The winner must capture 50 percent of the vote from the eight presidential candidates in order to win; otherwise, there is a runoff.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.