Afghan police kill 2 U.S. special forces
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, March 11, 2013, 9:45 p.m.
MAIDAN SHAHR, Afghanistan — An Afghan police officer gunned down two U.S. special forces personnel on Monday in Wardak province, less than 24 hours after President Hamid Karzai's deadline expired for them to leave the area where residents have grown increasingly hostile toward the Americans.
Despite Karzai's orders, the American special operations forces remain in the province where dozens of villagers accuse them and their Afghan partners of intimidation through unprovoked beatings, mass arrests and forced detentions. The shootout, which also killed two Afghan police officers, only deepens the distrust.
The U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan says it has found no evidence to support the claims of abuse. But infuriated by the villagers' allegations, Karzai two weeks ago ordered U.S. special operations forces to withdraw by midnight Sunday from Wardak province, 27 miles south of the capital, Kabul.
Most international forces are scheduled to withdraw from Afghanistan by the end of 2014. Wardak, like the rest of the country, is slated to be eventually handed over to Afghan forces, but U.S. Gen. Joseph Dunford, the top commander of American and coalition forces in Afghanistan, indicated on Sunday that the troops were not leaving Wardak province just yet.
“The only issue is the timeline and the methodology, and we're still working on that,” Dunford said.
Wardak has a stubborn insurgency on the doorstep of Kabul, and its location has led some U.S. military officials to warn that a premature withdrawal of American special operations forces would open a “six-lane highway” into Kabul for the Taliban.
Afghan security forces disagree, saying they don't think insurgents can capture the provincial capital.
On Monday, an Afghan policeman stood up in the back of a pickup truck, grabbed a machine gun and started firing at U.S. special forces and other Afghan police officers at a police compound in Wardak's Jalrez district, about 12 miles east of Maidan Shahr, said the province Deputy Police Chief Abdul Razaq Koraishi.
Two U.S. special operations forces and two Afghan officers were killed, and four others were wounded in the gunfight before the assailant was gunned down, Koraishi said.
A Defense official in Washington and a coalition official in Afghanistan said 10 Americans — both special operators and regular soldiers who worked in a combined team — and at least 12 Afghans were wounded in the attack. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss details of the attack with reporters.
It is not known whether the assailant was targeting the Afghan police officers along with the U.S. special operations forces and whether they were killed by the assailant's bullets or during the crossfire.
It's also unclear whether the incident was directly related to the simmering tensions between villagers in Wardak who are unhappy with the U.S. special operations forces and their Afghan partners.
Afghan police Sgt. Agha Mirza summed up the hostility toward American special forces that others also expressed during a series of interviews on Sunday in the province.
“They are always disturbing the people,” Mirza said, standing with his rifle slung over his shoulder at a checkpoint on the outskirts of Wardak's capital, Maidan Shahr. “If they disturb me, I have a gun.”
Grizzled and gray, Mohammed Nabi said his eldest son was picked up by U.S. special operations forces more than three months ago. No one has told his family where he is or why he was arrested.
“If they don't go, we will go,” Nabi said. “We will leave this place. I will set up a tent anywhere.”
He said dozens of families have moved out of his home village of Deh Afghanan because of alleged mistreatment by the special forces and their Afghan partners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- German court releases Nazi suspect, 94
- 6 held in theft of radioactive material
- 11-year-old pummels toddler
- North Korea releases American captive
- ‘Dangerous’ radioactive material found in Mexico
- Legendary French piano maker shuts doors after 206 years
- Islamists in Egypt call for dialogue to end political standoff
- Benghazi dangers frighten diplomats
- U.S. tells airlines to comply with China’s air-defense zone rule
- Automakers drool over Iran’s nuclear deal, eased sanctions
- Rebels raid Christian village