ShareThis Page

Obama headed to Israel on listening tour

| Sunday, March 17, 2013, 8:09 p.m.

WASHINGTON — President Obama will head to Israel on Tuesday hoping, but with little real expectation, that by smoothing rough relations, he can help restart the Middle East peace effort that went nowhere during his first term.

Obama will not carry with him a detailed proposal for how Israelis and Palestinians might resume talks, such as the one he offered in 2010. He instead plans a listening tour in Jerusalem and Ramallah to solicit views on what the sides want and to explore what might be possible.

The White House has sought to lower expectations for Obama's trip, particularly avoiding any anticipation of a breakthrough on peace talks. Even a renewed diplomatic effort, should one begin, stands a good chance of collapsing, they say.

Nonetheless, senior advisers say, Obama thinks time spent in public diplomacy is a worthwhile investment.

He is focused on “the broader role of public opinion in peacemaking,” according to one administration official.

He is not alone in thinking that the kind of outreach embodied by a presidential visit can make a difference.

“Israelis would love to see that he cares, and that it's not just a cerebral effort, but something that comes from the heart,” said former deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon. “Israelis — as tough as we may be considered abroad — are a very, very emotional people. If you smile at them and show some kind of positive attitude, you see they melt.”

That amounts to far more than just a popularity contest, Ayalon said. To achieve his foreign policy goals, he added, Obama will need to win over a deeply insecure Israeli public so that they, in turn, will pressure the government to take risks that could improve relations with the Palestinians.

Former President Bill Clinton, who made four trips to Israel, said at the time that he believed reassuring the Israeli public was one of the most important roles an American president could play in Mideast peacemaking.

On that score, Obama has considerable work to do with the Israeli public and leaders.

Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have had a notoriously poor relationship — at times last year, the Israeli leader seemed to be rooting for Republican Mitt Romney to win the White House.

With both Obama and Netanyahu having been re-elected, White House officials hope that, at minimum, the trip will ease that relationship and the domestic political pressures Obama has faced because of it.

Beyond Netanyahu, polls have shown many Israelis harbor suspicion of Obama that dates at least to his June 2009 trip to Cairo in which he called for a “new beginning” in America's relations with the Muslim world.

A poll published on Friday in the Maariv newspaper found that 38 percent of Israelis defined Obama's attitude toward their country as “hostile” compared with 33 percent who found it “favorable.” More worrisome for Obama, only 10 percent of respondents said their opinion of the president was favorable, while the rest said their view was indifferent, unfavorable or even “hateful.”

Obama hopes to begin changing that perception, appealing directly to Israelis in a speech in Jerusalem and in the symbolism that permeates his schedule.

“The president has a very strong record of support for Israel and its security,” said Ben Rhodes, deputy national security adviser to Obama, “but we also understand that there is no substitute for the president of the United States going to Israel and delivering that message directly to the Israeli people.”

Obama will spend just a few hours in Ramallah, the seat of the Palestinian Authority, and the rest of his three-day trip in Jerusalem. He plans to visit Yad Vashem, Israel's official memorial to the victims of the Holocaust.

He's scheduled to inspect an Iron Dome missile defense system, which was built with Pentagon aid.

He also plans to visit the grave of Theodor Herzl, the 19th-century founder of modern Zionism, and view the ancient biblical manuscripts known as the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Palestinians say it can't hurt for Obama to try to smooth things over with Israelis. But after their expectations of the early Obama administration were unmet, they are reluctant to get their hopes up.

Hanan Ashrawi, a longtime Palestinian legislator, said that while Secretary of State John Kerry clearly is interested in reviving the peace talks, “the jury is still out on whether Obama is going to give him the full backing he needs.”

If Obama “doesn't have a clear objective with a practical working plan and a binding timeline, it will be just treading water again,” Ashrawi said, and “he'd be better off not meddling at all.”

Palestinian expectations, she said, “are extremely low.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.