Russians not reassured by U.S. missile plan
MOSCOW — A change in U.S. plans for an anti-missile shield in Europe will not prompt Russia to drop its opposition to the system, a senior lawmaker allied with President Vladimir Putin said on Sunday.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced on Friday that the Pentagon would add 14 anti-missile interceptors in Alaska, among others, because North Korea had threatened a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the United States.
To free up funds, American officials said they were forgoing development of an interceptor that would have been deployed in central Europe and has been a focus of Russia's concern that the shield would be interfere with Moscow.
Alexei Pushkov, head of the foreign affairs committee in the Russian parliament's lower house, the State Duma, said the change would not dispel Moscow's concerns about the missile shield the United States and NATO were to develop.
“It would be premature to say that something has fundamentally changed,” said Pushkov, a member of the ruling party.
“The United States is readjusting the missile defense system due to financial and technology issues — issues not related to the Russian position,” he said.
A Russian diplomatic source said Moscow was looking into Hagel's announcement and would comment soon.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pentagon shifts from money pit of training Syrian rebels
- Number of deaths attributed to smoking in China could hit 2 million by 2030
- Nobel Peace Prize goes to Tunisia groups united to foster political diaglogue
- ‘Post-Ebola syndrome’ hospitalizes British nurse
- Backlash against Merkel over migrant flow grows
- Opening of Abu Dhabi’s Louvre pushed back
- EU hardens stance on immigration
- Violence spreads to Gaza Strip