British tourist jumps out of hotel, says she was trying to escape sex assault
By The Washington Post
Published: Tuesday, March 19, 2013, 9:36 p.m.
NEW DELHI — On a day when lawmakers discussed a new anti-rape law, a British tourist jumped off a balcony of her hotel room to escape being sexually assaulted by the hotel owner in Agra, the city of the Taj Mahal, police said on Tuesday.
The tourist fractured her leg when she jumped from the second floor.
Subhash Chand Dubey, a senior police officer, told reporters in Agra that the owner knocked on her door at 4 a.m., offered her a massage and refused to leave, even after she declined.
The hotel owner then tried to enter her room forcibly with a security guard, and the tourist jumped off the balcony to escape, Dubey said.
Dubey said the hotel owner has been arrested.
The incident occurred three days after a Swiss woman was gang raped while she was bicycling through central India with her husband.
In spite of the huge nationwide protest against the fatal gang rape of a young woman in New Delhi in December, as well as government efforts to pass tougher laws, the number of rape incidents continues to rise.
“We are today facing an epidemic in this country. Let's come to terms with that first,” said Pinaki Misra, a member of Parliament, as lawmakers discussed new anti-rape legislation that seeks to not only make punishment tougher, but also widen the definition of sexual assault to include stalking, voyeurism and acid attacks on women. “We are now called the rape capital of the world. What has happened to us?”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- India’s governing party trounced in state elections
- North Korea purges Kim Jong Un’s powerful uncle
- Mandela eulogized as ‘last great liberator’