Accord in Cyprus won't be a euro solution
By The Washington Post
Published: Monday, March 25, 2013, 8:42 p.m.
WASHINGTON — Europe called a mulligan.
Ten days ago, they arrived at a deal to rescue Cyprus in part by taking money out of depositors' accounts in the country's banks. The reaction was an unpleasant one, with the precedent of seizing money from European banks even for small depositors whose deposits are theoretically insured prompting new tremors of worry about the euro currency union.
They tried again this past weekend, with the same characters meeting in the same conference center in Brussels and hammering out the same issues. The new deal they came up with is a cobbled-together thing that fixes some of the most glaring problems of the earlier one. In particular, people with deposits in solvent Cypriot banks will no longer face the tax on their deposits. Even at the problem banks, Laiki and Bank of Cyprus, people with less than 100,000 euros in deposit will face no losses, consistent with Europe's bank deposit guarantee.
But the cost of protecting smaller depositors is that those with large deposits at the two problem banks are looking at huge losses — 40 to 50 percent, not the 9.9 percent in last week's deal. Much of that money represents deposits of wealthy Russians, who will be none too pleased with seeing their savings evaporate. Don't expect simmering diplomatic tensions between Russia and Western European nations to go away anytime soon.
The Europeans have found a way to bail out Cyprus that navigates the various imperatives they faced.
Germany's upcoming elections make Angela Merkel's government reluctant to undertake open-ended bailouts. The International Monetary Fund doesn't want to throw good money after bad by giving emergency lending to a country that will never be able to repay it.
And the European authorities don't want to undermine their communal bank deposit guarantee scheme before it has even really gotten going.
The question was always who would be stuck holding the bag. Cypriot taxpayers, Germany and the other stronger nations of Europe, or the depositors with big accounts in Cypriot banks (the list includes wealthy Cypriots, Russians, Brits and other international savers). The answer, overwhelmingly, has turned out to be the last of those, which is how the “troika” negotiators of the European Commission, IMF and European Central Bank navigated the constraints they were facing.
If you are a depositor in a European bank, you have every incentive in the world to move your money somewhere safer the minute you detect any hint that your nation could end up in the same place Cyprus did. The next time there is a banking panic in Europe, it will move much faster, and be much harder to control, than those of the recent past, as depositors try to get ahead of losses to come. And that's a scary proposition indeed.
Irwin writes the Econ Agenda column for The Washington Post.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Crimean vote called illegal
- Sedition charges possible for Kashmir fans of Pakistani cricket team
- Syrian rebels struggle to resist Assad’s onslaught
- Libya extradites son of Gadhafi
- Pistorius recalled as frantic, faithful moments after shooting
- Al-Qaida kills one of own for spying, flaunts body
- Syria breeds crop of jihadis
- Chinese news calls U.S. envoy slur
- Iran likely to dominate talks on sidelines of AIPAC forum
- Libya moves parliament to hotel in response to assault on chamber
- 16,000 Russian troops spill into Ukraine