Syrian activists seize key city
By The Washington Post
Published: Friday, March 29, 2013, 7:00 p.m.
Rebels took control of the city of Dael in southern Syria on Friday, according to activists and rebel fighters, a notable victory for the opposition in a conflict that has left at least 70,000 Syrians dead.
Dael sits along a strategic highway that connects Damascus to Jordan, about 13 miles from the city.
A few weeks ago, rebels seized the city of Raqqah in northern Syria. Jabhat al-Nusra, a religious extremist group that the United States has blacklisted for its links to al-Qaida, played a key role in the battle for Raqqah. But the group, also known as the al-Nusra Front, and other extremist organizations were not involved in the takeover of Dael, according to rebel fighters.
Rebels have been able to capture and hold large swaths of territory in northern and eastern Syria but have yet to establish a solid foothold in the south. Taking over Dael could signal a rebel push to make larger inroads in the southern portion of the country.
Rebel fighters launched the offensive to take over Dael because of its key location, and they engaged in fierce clashes with government troops at three checkpoints around the city, according to opposition activists and fighters. One video posted online shows a smoking tank with its turret blown off, surrounded by buildings damaged in fighting.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Assad forces regain control of key town
- Mandela closes American divide, as Obama, Bush, Hillary share flight to Johannesburg
- Putin dissolves, replaces Soviet-era news agency
- South Korea ups air defense ante
- India’s governing party trounced in state elections
- Bolshoi dancer sentenced to prison
- ‘Dangerous’ radioactive material found in Mexico
- 11-year-old pummels toddler
- Defense Secretary Hagel skips visit with Afghan President Karzai
- Bali summit yields global trade deal
- Becoming extra wife is fantasy in Kazakhstan