Paralyzing punishment evokes shock, pleas
By From Wire Reports
Published: Thursday, April 4, 2013, 9:27 p.m.
Alarmed by reports that Saudi Arabia will paralyze a man as punishment for allegedly stabbing a friend who ended up paralyzed, Britain urged the kingdom Thursday to abandon the “grotesque punishment.”
The Saudi Gazette reported last week that Ali Khawahir was sentenced to be paralyzed if he could not pay 1 million riyals — roughly $270,000 — to the friend he allegedly stabbed a decade ago. Khawahir was reportedly 14 years old when he was first jailed.
“But we don't have even a tenth of this sum,” Al-Khawahir's 60-year-old mother told the newspaper Al Hayat.
The Arabic-language al-Hayat daily said an unnamed philanthropist was trying to raise funds to pay the blood money, but it was not clear how much time remained before Khawahir's sentence was to be carried out.
Amnesty International called the eye-for-an-eye punishment “utterly shocking” and a violation of international law. “Paralyzing someone as punishment for a crime would be torture,” its Middle East and North Africa deputy director Ann Harrison said in a statement this week.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Panel to advise Pope Francis on sex abuse
- American teacher shot dead in Benghazi
- mexico Carjackers likely to die …
- Karzai says U.S. killed toddler
- Police: Toronto mayor tried to buy crack tape
- Canada reportedly permitted NSA surveillance at G-20
- Syrian troops capture key town
- Dozens killed in blast in Libya
- General apologizes for Afghan airstrike
- Did Comet ISON survive?
- Vatican’s centuries-old almoner role continues with modern twist