Share This Page

Sectarian battles kill 5 in Egypt

| Saturday, April 6, 2013, 8:18 p.m.
REUTERS
Protesters navigate through a street of objects set on fire by protesters during clashes with police in front of the High Court in Cairo on Saturday, April 6. Egyptian police fired tear gas to prevent opponents of President Mohamed Morsy storming the court and the prosecutor-general's office in central Cairo on Saturday, witnesses said.

CAIRO — At least five people were killed on Saturday in clashes between Muslims and Christians, raising new questions over whether President Mohamed Morsy's Islamist-led government can calm sectarian tensions amid Egypt's broader political unrest.

Violence between Muslims and Coptic Christians during the past year has been a troubling subplot, especially in the provinces, to the nation's post-revolutionary political division and faltering economy. There were conflicting accounts over what ignited the latest fighting in Khousous, an impoverished town north of Cairo.

The state news agency MENA reported that Muslims were angry over swastikas drawn by Christian youths on the wall of an Islamic institute. Other media reported that the clashes stemmed from a dispute between Christian and Muslim families.

Muslims set a church on fire, and both sides began shooting at each other.

Officials said five people were killed. The Al Ahram news website quoted a priest as saying at least eight people had died, including four Christians.

Coptic Christians make up about 10 percent of Egypt's population of 84 million. Despite underlying suspicions and occasional violence, including the 2011 bombing of a church that killed at least 24 worshippers, Copts and Muslims have coexisted for centuries.

But Christians are dismayed over the political rise of Islamists after the uprising that overthrew former President Hosni Mubarak two years ago.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.