Share This Page

Billionaire sues over Soros link

| Thursday, April 11, 2013, 10:03 p.m.

LONDON — Israeli billionaire Beny Steinmetz is suing his former London-based business advisers and a British ex-minister in a battle over Guinea's mineral wealth.

Steinmetz has been at odds with the government of the West African country over the right to mine half of the giant Simandou deposit, one of the world's largest untapped iron ore discoveries.

The mining arm of his business empire, BSG Resources, accuses the government's high-profile foreign advisers, including the hedge fund billionaire and philanthropist George Soros, of carrying out a damaging and personal smear campaign to thwart its ambitions in Guinea.

Soros-backed organizations such as Revenue Watch say they are helping Guinea's President Alpha Conde and his government achieve greater benefits to ordinary Guineans from mining deals.

Steinmetz and BSGR accuse their own former communications and business advisory firm, FTI Consulting, of breaching its contract with BSGR .

Steinmetz and BSGR are suing FTI Consulting and FTI executive Mark Malloch-Brown, a former British government minister, for breach of contract and, for the latter, a “collusive and unlawful” relationship with Soros.

They accuse Malloch-Brown, who is close to Soros and was vice chairman of his investment funds, of handing over confidential information on BSGR and of failing to disclose his ties to the financier and alert BSGR to the potential conflict of interest.

“(Malloch-Brown's) relationship with Mr. Soros was so close that (he) was in charge of funding the very NGOs which were building a case against BSGR,” BSGR said in the documents.

BSGR's project is now on hold as Guinea's government reviews its right to operate in the country.

FTI, which is also representing Malloch-Brown, said it had not yet received formal notification of the case.

A spokesman for FTI said it lacked merit. “Once served on us, we intend to defend this claim vigorously,” he said.

People in Soros's offices had no immediate comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.