Kerry visits Seoul on diplomatic mission to ease tensions with North Korea
By McClatchy Newspapers
Published: Friday, April 12, 2013, 9:33 p.m.
SEOUL — The fever pitch surrounding North Korea's threats of hostile action began to ease on Friday, as Secretary of State John Kerry arrived in South Korea to push a diplomatic track that would include China to defuse the tension.
Kerry warned at a news conference alongside South Korean Foreign Minister Yun Byung-se that “North Korea will not be accepted as a nuclear power” and vowed to defend America's Asian allies in the event of a conflict. But he reiterated that the Obama administration prefers diplomacy, including direct talks with Pyongyang if it agreed to move toward dumping its nuclear program.
“They have to be really serious,” Kerry said. “No one is going to talk for the sake of talking, and no one is going to continue to play this round-robin game that gets repeated every few years, which is both unnecessary and dangerous.”
Separately, in another sign of the softening rhetoric, a U.S. official in Seoul told visiting reporters that there was no indication of an imminent missile launch, no North Korean troop buildup on the border, no extraordinary military exercises and no alarm from foreign diplomats based in Pyongyang. The 28,500 U.S. forces in South Korea weren't on any special alert.
“The tensions around the world are much more than they are here,” the official said.
The official, who spoke only on the condition of anonymity, added that Pyongyang had even invited foreigners to North Korea to run a marathon and that Seoul was holding its annual spring festival as usual.
“Given the latest cycle of rhetoric, I'd like to reassure you that we are monitoring the situation very, very closely, and essentially life goes on here in Seoul,” the official said. “We are basically conducting business as usual. We see no escalatory things going on.”
The U.S. official said a missile launch might actually work toward reducing tensions by giving the young North Korean dictator, Kim Jong Un, “an off ramp,” a way for him to step back from his threats and still save face.
“You could say, ‘I've stood up to the United States; I launched a missile. We did this, and now I can safely come back to my people and say, “I am the great leader. I'm like my father, I'm like my grandfather, and I have a strong hold on our defense,' ” the official said.
At the White House, spokesman Jay Carney said North Korea's behavior was part of a pattern of saber rattling but that the United States was taking the issue seriously. He said it had taken a number of steps, including postponing the planned test this month of a Minuteman III missile, “recognizing that it could be inaccurately construed by some as an attempt to exacerbate tensions on the Korean Peninsula.”
The move away from hawkish language occurred a day after a U.S. intelligence report raised alarm about North Korea's nuclear advancements. Unclassified parts of the Defense Intelligence Agency report stated with “moderate confidence” that North Korea could fire a ballistic missile armed with a nuclear warhead.
The agency wouldn't confirm or deny the report or its finding, and Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday, “I can't touch that one. ... Some of it's classified, some of it's unclassified.”
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said in a subsequent statement that North Korea “has not yet demonstrated the full range of capabilities necessary for a nuclear armed missile.”
Pyongyang hasn't yet tried such a device in the field, and the agency's report noted that its “reliability will be low.” It was also far from clear whether North Korea's ability to fit missiles with nuclear warheads, if indeed it can, extends to the sort of intercontinental missile capable of hitting the United States that requires complicated re-entry vehicles to descend to a target.
Kerry and Yun, the South Korean foreign minister, said the North Koreans' program was worrisome but probably not yet capable of a successful start-to-finish deployment of a nuclear warhead.
“We believe, regarding the nuclear capability of North Korea, it's quite high,” Yun said. “Nevertheless, at the current time right now, their militarization, diversification, we believe that in that way they probably need to develop a little bit further.”
The U.S. official offered a similar assessment. “I think it's premature to say that they've been able to put everything together, from the warhead, launching it, getting it to re-enter and actually target something,” he said.
Pyongyang launched a satellite into space in December, a development widely seen as cover for testing its ballistic missile program, which was followed two months later by a test of what it described as “a smaller and lighter A-bomb.” Both those developments ran afoul of U.N. Security Council resolutions that have called on North Korea to suspend its nuclear and ballistic missile programs. North Korea, meanwhile, has said it's ready to wage nuclear war against South Korea or the United States.
Concerns were further stoked Monday when Pyongyang announced that it was pulling 53,000 workers out of the Kaesong industrial park, a joint venture with South Korean businesses in North Korea that's seen as a crucial bellwether of relations. The venture had continued to operate in the past even as North Korea spouted thus-far empty rhetoric about turning Seoul into a “sea of fire.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Syrian rebels struggle to resist Assad’s onslaught
- Pistorius recalled as frantic, faithful moments after shooting
- Sedition charges possible for Kashmir fans of Pakistani cricket team
- Crimean vote called illegal
- Progress reported on tenuous Ukraine
- Crimea lawmakers schedule vote on joining Russia
- Al-Qaida kills one of own for spying, flaunts body
- Libya extradites son of Gadhafi