Afghan investigation finds airstrike killed 17
KABUL, Afghanistan — Taliban insurgents and the U.S. military are to blame for an airstrike a week ago that killed 17 people, including a dozen children, during a fierce battle in eastern Afghanistan, says President Hamid Karzai.
Karzai made his comments on Saturday after an Afghan investigation into the April 6 attack. The probe raised the civilian death toll from 11 to 17, including 12 children, four women and one innocent man. An American civilian adviser was killed during the fighting.
The Afghan report says the U.S. strike occurred when the Afghan intelligence service came under attack by militants during an operation to arrest two insurgent commanders in the Shigal district of Kunar province. The area is a major infiltration route for insurgents from sanctuaries in northwestern Pakistan to Afghanistan.
The U.S.-led coalition has confirmed that it conducted airstrikes in Kunar province that day but has not confirmed civilian casualties, saying the investigation is ongoing.
Afghan forces came under fire with heavy and light weapons as they were about to leave the area.
The U.S. civilian adviser was killed in the assault, causing Americans to call for air support to remove the body at the same time that houses believed to be containing suspected insurgents were bombarded for hours by planes.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Turkish hostages freed from Islamic State, but questions linger
- Study: Ocean algae can evolve fast to adjust to climate change
- Floods paralyze Manila
- More Iraq deployments may be needed as terrorist fight intensifies, Army chief says
- It’s not a small world after all: Global population estimated to soar
- Scotland’s ‘No’ will change Britain
- Ukraine plan would give rebels self-rule to end fighting
- Scots reject independence from United Kingdom in historic vote
- Islamic State releases video showing execution of British aid worker
- Scotland urged to remain in United Kingdom
- 21 massacred in Mexico, witnesses say