Dutch king's song scrapped after online criticism
THE HAGUE — A song specially written to be sung by the nation to the Netherlands' new king on the day of his inauguration has been “withdrawn” by its producer after it triggered a storm of online criticism and ridicule, a government committee confirmed on Sunday.
The song that was supposed to unite a nation behind its new monarch instead had the effect of dividing it into two camps; those who hated the song and those who loved it.
An online petition against the song, which was written using suggestions from the public and features a blend of Dutch rock ballad and rap styles, had been signed by more than 30,000 people Sunday. But the song clearly had its fans, as it was ranked No. 1 on the Dutch iTunes chart.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Swiss museum vows artwork looted by Nazis will be returned
- Job unlikely to be easy for new U.S. ambassador to Russia
- With sanctions, sliding oil prices, Russia losing more than $100B a year, finance minister says
- Coal corruption scandal saps enthusiasm for eastern Ukraine rebels
- Annual global obesity costs rise to $2T
- Islamic State drive for Kobani blunted
- Crowds in Ukraine show lingering tensions amid Biden visit to back pro-West officials
- Chinese state media give profs a chilling warning
- Russian diplomat Lavrov accuses West of seeking ‘regime changee_SSRq
- 100 terrorists killed in Kenya retaliation act
- Nuclear talks with Iran extended until March; GOP senators call for more sanctions