Kerry: Pakistan-Afghanistan meetings end 'on a good track'
BRUSSELS — After meeting for more than three hours here Wednesday with Afghan and Pakistani leaders, Secretary of State John Kerry reported progress in restarting negotiations but warned, “We're not going to raise expectations or promise results that can't be delivered.”
Instead, Kerry said before boarding a plane to return to Washington, the leaders agreed to “underpromise but deliver.”
“We're all going to go home and do our homework,” he said, flanked by Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Gen. Ashfaq Kayani, Pakistan's army chief. The trio had eaten lunch together and walked the grounds of a secluded estate outside Brussels as part of their meeting.
Karzai and Kayani, who had eyed each other warily at the beginning of the session, standing stiffly before a row of reporters, shook hands warmly at the end. Kerry promised that they would continue the dialogue in hopes of finding a way to work together on peace negotiations with the Taliban.
“We agreed we are committed to try to find stability and peace for both countries and the region,” Kerry said. “I think we're on a good track,” he added, but “results will tell the story.”
The meeting was held amid a new round of recriminations between the two governments and rising nervousness on both sides of their shared border over the fast-approaching departure of U.S. combat troops from Afghanistan.
Obama administration officials, who have long said that a negotiated settlement with the Taliban was the only way to truly end the Afghanistan war, see the window closing for negotiations and the establishment of cooperative relations between the South Asian neighbors.
Kerry called “the road forward” a “crucial transformation period.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Putin casts off rich cronies as sanctions hit Russian elite
- Focus shifts as Ebola outbreak slows
- Japan stunned by video claiming death of 1 of 2 Islamic State hostages
- 10 troops die as Greek fighter jet crashes during NATO training
- 3 American contractors killed in apparent Afghan ‘insider attack’
- Rescue workers seek survivors in rubble of children’s hospital