Pakistani political parties targeted
PESHAWAR, Pakistan — Taliban attacks on the election offices of two candidates in northwest Pakistan killed at least 11 people and injured 30 on Sunday, the latest in a string of terrorist strikes that have cast a shadow over parliamentary elections scheduled for mid-May.
A Taliban spokesman, Ehsanullah Ehsan, claimed responsibility for the attacks.
In recent weeks, Pakistan has been rocked by bombings directed primarily at candidates and backers of three liberal, secular parties: the Awami National Party based in the country's northwest; President Asif Ali Zardari's Pakistan People's Party, which led the civilian government for the last five years; and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, the ruling party in Karachi, the country's largest city.
The bombings have been occurring almost daily.
Several weeks ago, the Pakistani Taliban had warned they would attack candidates and leaders of the ANP, PPP and MQM because it regards those parties as enemies of Islam.
The bombings on Sunday targeted two independent candidates from the country's tribal region along the Afghan border, an area that is home to many of militant groups, including the Pakistani Taliban. The insurgent group, which for years has been waging war against the Pakistani government and its military, claimed responsibility.
One of the blasts occurred near the city of Kohat, just south of northwest Pakistan's largest city, Peshawar. Police said a homemade bomb was detonated by remote control outside the office of Noor Akbar, a parliament candidate from the tribal area of Orakzai. Eight died, and 16 were wounded, police said.
The other bombing occurred in Peshawar at the office of Nasir Khan Afridi, a candidate from the Khyber tribal area. Three were killed and 14 injured, police said.
Neither Akbar nor Afridi were in the targeted offices at the time of the attacks.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.