Egypt's president, judges eye reform
CAIRO — The Egyptian president's office indicated on Sunday that a compromise has been reached with the judiciary to defuse an uproar over a proposed law that would have forced out thousands of the country's most senior judges.
Just three days earlier, the country's Islamist-led parliament pushed ahead with the disputed bill that would have lowered the retirement age for judges from 70 to 60. That would affect nearly a quarter of Egypt's 13,000 judges and prosecution officials.
The draft also would have barred the courts from reviewing or overturning presidential decrees issued by President Mohamed Morsy late last year, including his unilateral appointment of a new top prosecutor.
The crisis over the judiciary is a reflection of the deep polarization that has split the country over the rule of Morsy and his Muslim Brotherhood party. He has been in a power struggle with the judiciary since his June election.
In an attempt to resolve the situation, Morsy met on Sunday with five top judges. A statement from the president's office after the meeting said Morsy will implement a conference this week to work out a compromise with judges regarding laws that affect the judiciary.
“The president said he will personally adopt all the conclusions of the conference for proposals of bills in order to submit them to the legislative council,” the statement said.
After the meeting, opponents of the proposed law canceled protests set for Monday.
The president's allies say the courts are filled with loyalists of the deposed regime of Hosni Mubarak. The opposition accuses Morsy's backers of calling for reform of the judiciary as a cover to install their supporters.
A protest by opponents and supporters of the bill led to street clashes in the capital nine days ago, and thousands of judges met last week to demand international organizations investigate the crisis.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.