6 admit planning terror attack in England
By The Los Angeles Times
Published: Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 9:51 p.m.
LONDON — Six men pleaded guilty on Tuesday to planning a terrorist attack that failed only because the far-right rally they were targeting in central England ended before they arrived.
Police discovered the plot when they searched the men's car during a routine traffic check. Inside the trunk was a cache of weapons that included machetes, knives, sawed-off shotguns and at least one crude bomb packed with nails.
The men pleaded guilty just days after the sentencing of another group of aspiring Islamic terrorists in Britain. In that case, the plotters were planning an attack intended to rival the 2005 transit bombings in London that killed 52 people. The ringleader of the group was sentenced to life in prison. The defendants in both cases are from the Birmingham area in central England, although the two plots do not appear to have been related.
The six men who entered guilty pleas in a London court had decided to go on a rampage through a June 30 rally conducted by a far-right anti-Muslim group, the English Defense League, police said. The plotters drove to the rally site with their weapons but arrived to find that the gathering had broken up because one of the featured speakers was a no-show.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pakistan army wants private news channel closed over allegations that link intel agency to shooting
- Sri Lanka to boot British tourist over Buddha tattoo
- Pontiff seeks to bring faith to ‘ends of Earth’
- Al-Qaida in Yemen shows ‘strength,’ warns U.S.
- 12 killed, 4 missing in avalanche on Mt. Everest
- Pope Francis, huge crowd joyously celebrate Easter
- Sherpas ponder boycott because of Everest avalanche
- Extension for sputtering Mideast talks possible