Belgian mystery: Who is hiding the stolen money?
ZEDELGEM, Belgium — On a Saturday evening two weeks ago in Zedelgem, townsfolk were disturbed by the wail of a siren and the shriek of tires, the din of a high-speed car chase that broke the tranquility of their sleepy city.
Suddenly, cash was flying through the air like confetti at carnival.
Dozens of people rushed out of homes or cars to grab a share of the accidental bounty: about 1 million euros ($1.3 million) in all. The small fortune had flown from a safe that cracked open when the fleeing robbers panicked and threw it out the window.
“It was,” recalled Mayor Patrick Arnou, ‘‘a rainstorm of money.” Everyone from kids to the elderly ran out to take part in the free-for-all.
Now, the cops want the money back, and the townspeople face a thorny dilemma: Play things badly, and you could face two years in jail. Keep a poker face, and the money could be yours to keep.
A veil of suspicion has fallen over the town. Neighbors watch neighbors as police go door to door, questioning townsfolk about what they did — and what they saw others do.
‘‘People talk about nothing else any more in this town,” Arnou said. ‘‘In the street itself, there is an atmosphere of bitterness.”
It all started when the robbers broke into a home in a neighboring town and made off with the safe. The getaway car was soon identified; by chance, a motorcycle police officer spotted it and gave chase.
When the cop and robbers hit Zedelgem's Ruddervoordsestraat, a street lined by simple red-brick row houses, the thieves tried to shake off the officer by throwing the safe in his way. As it careened down the asphalt, the box shot open. A cloud of bills — some worth as much as 500 euros — swirled through the air and drifted down.
Dozens of wide-eyed people flooded the street, grabbing handfuls of cash. Drivers got out of their cars, snatched money and sped away.
Arnou says authorities have secured nearly half of the million euros that were originally in the safe. But the rest of the cash has disappeared into the hands of those who happened to be on that street in Zedelgem. As for the robbers, they still have not been caught — as police attention was diverted by trying to retrieve the money.
A disheartened Arnou says his citizens should have known better. After all, he points out, the money belongs to innocent people who are now out of 1 million euros.
“What we have seen is beyond decency,” the mayor said.
Once the adrenaline rush subsided, some people reached the same conclusion and handed back what they found. Late Wednesday, a couple drove from Antwerp, about 100 kilometers (60 miles) away, to hand over 16,200 euros they had picked up driving through town.
Arnou designated the mailbox outside city hall as a spot for people to hand over money — no questions asked. One contrite individual wrapped a big wad of money in an envelope and deposited it there.
Not a good idea.
Once word got out, thieves tried to unhinge the heavy stone letterbox over the weekend and make off with its contents. It didn't work, and the postbox stood there half-cracked for days — a sad testament to human greed. On Thursday, Arnou watched as workmen repaired the postbox and encased it deeper in concrete.
The case has triggered a passionate debate in Zedelgem.
‘‘There is a major discussion between people who think it should be given back and those who say ‘keep what you got,'” Arnou said. “We are talking about sharp debates and opinions are very divided.”
But for local prosecutor Jean-Marie Berkvens, things could not be clearer: ‘‘Fraudulent concealment,” he said, “carries a maximum jail penalty of two years.”
At the Cartouche bar, across the street from the city hall postbox, bar owner Emely Derous has been moderating between people on both sides of the divide.
She says picking up the money is just human nature.
“Jokingly they say: ‘I would have done it this way or that way to keep as much as possible,'” Derous said. ‘‘And yes, I might have done the same thing myself. I think everybody thinks that way.”
Police want them to change their minds.
In a letter sent around to townsfolk, police again asked for a return of the money and added: ‘‘If you have additional information regarding people who picked up money, pass it along to our services.”
In those magical minutes that Saturday, it remains unclear whether anyone took out a camera or a mobile phone to capture the moment. And there's no CCTV on the street.
The lack of evidence only adds to the suspense for mayor Arnou. But the consequences promise to be serious.
‘‘For now, police are still trying benign ways,” he said. “Once everyone has had the chance to talk and it turns out they still have money, then the legal cases will come.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.