Nixon's grandson Cox retraces former president's 1972 China tour
BEIJING — “He would be amazed,” exclaimed Christopher Nixon Cox, digging into a plate of fried rice in a starkly modern restaurant with black-clad waiters and white walls at the foot of the Great Wall of China.
Cox was referring to his grandfather, the late President Richard Nixon, whose 1972 trip to China he is retracing.
Although the 34-year-old investment banker has been to China 15 times, he was channeling what he imagined would have been the late president's awe four decades after that historic visit at seeing the skyscrapers, the bumper-to-bumper freeways, the fashions and other obvious manifestations of rising affluence.
“I remember my grandfather telling me that to have 1 billion of the world's most hard-working and talented people in isolation is something that is dangerous for the world,” Cox recalled over lunch on Saturday near the Badaling section of the Great Wall. “He felt that a prosperous China was critical for peace and stability.”
Nixon's 1972 trip is credited for prying open China to the world.
The commemorative trip, which marks 100 years since Nixon's birth, is patterned on the 1972 trip, with visits to Beijing, Hangzhou and Shanghai and obligatory stops at all the landmarks: Tiananmen Square, the Great Hall of the People and, of course, the Great Wall.
The delegation of more than 40 people includes Robert “Bud” McFarlane, who served as President Reagan's national security adviser, and Cox's wife, a striking blonde supermarket heiress, Andrea Catsimatidis, who has attracted the most attention from the Chinese.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.