Kabul files protest with Pakistan
Kabul files protest withPakistan
KABUL, Afghanistan — The Afghan government summoned Pakistan's charge d'affaires in Kabul to the Foreign Ministry on Monday to file a “strong protest” over another clash along the countries' troubled border.
The skirmish, which broke out in the morning and lasted a couple of hours, underscored the deteriorating relations between the two countries at a time when U.S. officials are pressing them to step up efforts to reach a settlement with Taliban militants.
The Afghan Foreign Ministry accused Pakistan of an “unprovoked attack” against its troops in the Goshta district of Nangarhar province that involved both heavy and light weapons.
No Afghan casualties were reported in the firefight, which occurred in the same area where a clash last week killed an Afghan policeman.
A spokesman for the Pakistani Foreign Ministry, Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, told The Associated Press that a Pakistani military post near the border came under fire from Afghanistan on Monday morning, injuring one of the Pakistani troops.
“That post has been under attack for some time now,” he was quoted as saying.
Meanwhile, the Department of Defense announced that five soldiers were killed by an IED on Saturday in Maiwand, Afghanistan:
• 1st Lt. Brandon J. Landrum, 26, of Oklahoma;
• Staff Sgt. Francis G. Phillips IV, 28, of New York;
• Spc. Kevin Cardoza, 19, of Texas;
• Spc. Thomas P. Murach, 22, of Idaho;
• Spc. Brandon J. Prescott, 24, of Bend, Ore.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Mecca pilgrimage death toll at 1,399
- Svetlana Alexievich of Belarus wins Nobel literature prize
- Concern is clear among visitors to China’s glass-bottom bridge
- India’s ‘green’ energy plan doubles use of coal
- Syria’s Assad praises Russian airstrikes
- Dead families huddled, died in Guatemala mudslide
- Car bombs across Iraq kill 56
- North Korea frees NYU student
- U.S. allies in Syria struck by Russians
- Eastern European gangs smuggle nuclear materials, seek terrorist clients
- Spreading Israeli-Palestinian clashes spurred by violence in Jerusalem raise fears of new uprising