Pakistani politician Imran Khan injured in fall at rally
By The Associated Press
Published: Tuesday, May 7, 2013, 9:45 p.m.
LAHORE, Pakistan — One of Pakistan's most prominent politicians, former cricket star Imran Khan, fell at a political rally on Tuesday, leaving him with two hairline skull fractures and knocking him off the campaign trail before Saturday's general election.
Khan emerged as a wild-card candidate, and it is unclear how much his widespread personal popularity will translate into votes at the polls. His Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, however, is considered one of the top three parties in the country.
Khan was treated at the hospital he built in honor of his late mother in the eastern city of Lahore. Doctors told local television that Khan suffered two minor fractures of the skull and had a backache, but none of his injuries was life-threatening.
Just hours after the fall, the charismatic politician spoke to reporters from his hospital bed. He was visibly shaken and had a cut on his forehead, but he was still asking people to vote for his party.
“I have done whatever I could do,” he told national broadcaster Dunya TV. “Now you have to decide whether you want to make a new Pakistan.”
Asad Omar, leader of Khan's party, told Pakistan's Geo News that party leaders would meet on Wednesday to discuss how to continue his campaign.
He said Khan will spend the night in the hospital and that doctors are asking him to rest for 15 days. The former cricket star is in good physical condition and wants to resume his political activities as soon as possible, Omar said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.