ShareThis Page

1969 telegram displayed in Prague invites dreams of super group that never was: Hendrix, Davis, Williams and McCartney

| Friday, May 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
In this 1970 file photo, Jimi Hendrix performs on the Isle of Wight in England.
In this 1970 file photo, Jimi Hendrix performs on the Isle of Wight in England.

LONDON — Miles and Jimi. Jimi and Miles. Fans of the late trumpet and guitar masters have long known that Miles Davis and Jimi Hendrix had been making plans to record together in the year before Hendrix's sudden death in 1970.

But less attention has been paid to the bass player they were trying to recruit: Paul McCartney, who was busy with another band at the time.

This tantalizing detail about the super group that never was — jazz standout Tony Williams would have been on drums — is contained in an oft-overlooked telegram that Hendrix sent to McCartney at The Beatles' Apple Records in London on Oct. 21, 1969.

“We are recording and LP together this weekend in NewYork,” it says, complete with typographical errors. “How about coming in to play bass stop call Alvan Douglas 212-5812212. Peace Jimi Hendrix Miles Davis Tony Williams.”

The telegram has been part of the Hard Rock Cafe memorabilia collection since it was purchased at auction in 1995. Still, it has generated attention only in recent months with the successful release of “People, Hell & Angels,” expected to be the last CD of Hendrix's studio recordings.

“It's not something you hear about a lot,” Hard Rock historian Jeff Nolan said of the telegram, on display in the restaurant in Prague. “Major Hendrix connoisseurs are aware of it. It would have been one of the most insane supergroups. These four cats certainly reinvented their instruments and the way they're perceived.”

French promoter and Hendrix fanatic Yazid Manou, who has researched the telegram, said it offers a glimpse of what might have been.

“It's amazing because of the names of the people,” he said. “Of course, that didn't happen, but the telegram brings us something to dream about. This is a document, proof that they had an idea to do an album.”

The telegram raises more questions than it answers. It advises McCartney to contact producer Alan Douglas (whose first name is misspelled in the cable) if he could make the session. But it's not clear if McCartney was even aware of the unusual, apparently impromptu invitation to rush from his London base to New York for the planned session.

Beatles aide Peter Brown replied on McCartney's behalf, telling Hendrix the next day that McCartney was on vacation and not expected back for two weeks.

The invitation came at an extremely awkward moment for the Beatles' bassist. It was sent the same day a prominent New York City radio station gave wide exposure to a rumor that McCartney had died in a car crash and been replaced by a lookalike. The bizarre story, supposedly supported by hints on Beatles records and album covers, briefly gained worldwide credibility. Its dark nature apparently prompted the exasperated McCartney to retreat with his family to their farm in Scotland.

It was a period in which the Beatles were falling apart because of business and artistic conflicts that likely would have been exacerbated by McCartney appearing on a record with Hendrix and Davis. McCartney was still bound by a songwriting partnership with John Lennon that might have further complicated the release of any McCartney-Hendrix-Davis compositions.

And then there is the question of what the proposed group would have sounded like. Davis was moving away from his jazz roots toward a fusion-based sound. He said in his autobiography that by 1968, he was listening primarily to James Brown, Sly and the Family Stone and, particularly, Hendrix — musicians joined by a love of syncopated funk not found on Beatles tracks.

It is not clear how McCartney's melodic, subtle bass playing would have made its presence felt in a band that included Hendrix on guitar and Davis on trumpet.

“At first, though, it sounds really weird and off the wall. But on second thought, it makes perfect, Hendrix-type sense to chuck in someone who's a great musician but comes from a different tradition,” said Hendrix biographer Charles Shaar Murray. “I regret this never actually took place. ... it would have been magnificent.”

McCartney is the only one of the four musicians who is still alive. His spokesman, Stuart Bell, said the former Beatle is too busy on his world tour to comb his memory for his thoughts about a telegram sent more than four decades ago.

In his autobiography, Davis said he and Hendrix occasionally jammed together in his apartment in New York City and tried to get into the studio to record but were hampered by financial matters and by their busy schedules. Murray and others maintain that Davis wanted $50,000 up front to attend the session.

Davis, a Juilliard-trained trumpeter, described Hendrix, who learned his chops backing up the Isley Brothers and others, as a self-taught “natural musician” who could not read music but was able to pick up complicated pieces in the blink of an eye.

Davis says in the book that he and arranger Gil Evans were in Europe planning to record with Hendrix at the time of his death in London.

“What I didn't understand is why nobody told him not to mix alcohol and sleeping pills,” Davis wrote.

Hendrix's death dashed their recording plans. Eddie Kramer, the engineer who produced most of Hendrix's music, said there will always be speculation about what might have been.

“I think it would have been phenomenal,” Kramer said. “Lord knows where it may have gone; those huge egos in the studio at the same time! I would have loved to have done that one. But it was not to be.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.