Japanese mayor notes insensitivity of telling U.S. troops to visit his nation's adult establishments
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, May 16, 2013, 9:51 p.m.
TOKYO — An outspoken mayor who outraged many with remarks about Japan's wartime and modern sexual services stood by his comments on Thursday, but said he may have lacked “international sensitivity.”
Osaka Mayor Toru Hashimoto said his lack of sensitivity to America's perception of prostitution might have caused outrage. He suggested earlier this week that American troops based in southern Japan should patronize legal adult-entertainment establishments to reduce sex crime there.
Hashimoto, co-leader of an emerging nationalist party, also angered Japan's neighbors by saying that his country's military-wartime practice of forcing Asian women into prostitution was necessary to maintain discipline and provide relaxation for soldiers.
He claimed that the practice was widely used by many other countries during World War II and that Japan was being unfairly singled out.
The State Department called Hashimoto's comments “outrageous and offensive.”
Historians say up to 200,000 women —mainly from the Korean Peninsula and China — were forced to provide sex for Japanese soldiers in military brothels.
Although some other World War II armies had military brothels, Japan is the only country accused of such widespread, organized sexual slavery.
Hashimoto said he has no intention of retracting his earlier comments.
“If there is one big mistake I made, that might have been my lack of understanding of culture behind the U.S. sex industry — if you mention adult entertainment in the U.S., everyone thinks of prostitution,” he said.
said during a live TV talk show from Osaka, in western Japan. “I admit that my international sensitivity was quite poor when I had to operate beyond national borders.”
The ruckus started Monday when Hashimoto commented on the wartime “comfort women” who had to provide sex to Japan's Imperial Army. Hashimoto said that on a recent visit to the southern island of Okinawa he suggested to the U.S. commander there that the troops make use of the legal sex industry.
More than half of about 50,000 U.S. troops based in Japan under a bilateral security pact are on Okinawa, where base-related crime has long triggered anti-U.S. military sentiment.
U.S. officials rejected his proposal. “That goes without saying,” Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said Tuesday in Washington.
In a tweet Wednesday, Rep. Mike Honda, a Democrat who has urged Japan to take responsibility for wartime sex slavery, called Hashimoto's remarks that “comfort women” were necessary “contemptible and repulsive,” and demanded Japan's government “apologize for this atrocity.”
U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the trafficking of women for sexual purposes during that era was “a grave human rights violation of enormous proportions.”
“We hope that Japan will continue to work with its neighbors to address this and other issues arising from the past and cultivate relationships that allow them to move forward,” Psaki told reporters Thursday.
Hashimoto said Thursday that his comments were not intended to justify or whitewash Japan's use of prostitution for its wartime military and that Japan should apologize to the women whether or not they were forced into it.
Hashimoto's comments came amid continuing criticism of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's earlier pledges to revise Japan's past apologies for wartime atrocities. Before he took office in December, Abe had advocated revising a 1993 statement by then-Prime Minister Yohei Kono acknowledging and expressing remorse for the suffering caused to the sex slaves.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- North Korea releases American captive
- 6 held in theft of radioactive material
- 11-year-old pummels toddler
- German court releases Nazi suspect, 94
- Benghazi dangers frighten diplomats
- U.S. tells airlines to comply with China’s air-defense zone rule
- Automakers drool over Iran’s nuclear deal, eased sanctions
- Rebels raid Christian village
- Anti-government mass rally in Ukraine turns violent
- Egyptian panel likely to include women, Christians
- Karzai government accuses U.S. of withholding fuel from Afghan troops