Sacre bleu! French in uproar over plan for courses in English
By The Washington Post
Published: Saturday, May 18, 2013, 9:21 p.m.
PARIS — There was a time, not so long ago, when anyone with a proper education spoke French. Even today the country cares so much about its language it maintains a whole ministry to promote it.
So when Higher Education Minister Genevieve Fioraso last week introduced a bill that would let French colleges teach more courses in English, even when English is not the subject, the idea sparked outrage.
The goal, she explained, is to attract more students from such countries as China, Brazil and India.
“Ten years ago, we were third in welcoming foreign students, but today we are fifth,” she said in the magazine Nouvel Observateur. “Germany has put in place an English program that has passed us by. We must make up the gap.”
Her plan has united people from across the political spectrum who insist that learning French should be part of any foreign student's experience in France.
“You cannot image an idea that is stupider, more counterproductive, more dangerous and more contrary to the interest of France,” Jacques Attali, an adviser to the late President Francois Mitterrand, intoned in a blog.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Suspected attack leader still ‘free’
- American teacher shot dead in Benghazi
- Rebels raid Christian village
- U.S. can’t get China to yield on contentious air zone
- ‘Dangerous’ radioactive material found in Mexico
- mexico Carjackers likely to die …
- Panel to advise Pope Francis on sex abuse