Key omissions on final Iranian candidate list put riot police on guard in Tehran
TEHRAN — The final list of candidates approved to run in Iran's June 14 presidential election was announced on Tuesday, generating surprise and tension with the omission of a former president considered one of the founding members of the Islamic Republic.
In addition to two-term ex-president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Ahmadinejad's top aide, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, was disqualified from the ballot, although no immediate reason was given why. Both men were last-minute and somewhat controversial registrants, but their omission could cause a backlash from rivals of Iran's conservative establishment.
Conservatives including Tehran's mayor, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, former foreign minister Ali Akbar Velayati and the country's lead nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, dominate the list of eight candidates approved by the Guardian Council.
Large groups of riot police, the kind that patrolled Tehran's streets in the days after the contested 2009 re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, patrolled on motorcycles throughout the capital for the first time in more than a year, perhaps in anticipation of the candidate announcement.
Many people had anticipated Mashaei's disqualification because of attempts he and Ahmadinejad had made to undermine the authority of Iran's clergy. But Rafsanjani's removal from the race was less expected, despite a systematic campaign to discredit the 78-year-old's potential candidacy that began almost as soon as he registered Saturday.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.