ShareThis Page

Moderate wins Iranian presidential election

| Saturday, June 15, 2013, 8:27 p.m.

TEHRAN — Centrist Hasan Rowhani won an absolute majority in Iran's presidential elections, a surprise outcome that could help raise spirits in a population fed up by the economic distress and international isolation that marked the era of outgoing leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The ministry of the interior said Rowhani, a Shiite Muslim cleric, won about 18.6 million votes, nearly 51 percent of the vote in a six-man field, three times the tally for runner-up Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, the mayor of Tehran, who received only 6.1 million. In third place was nuclear arms negotiator Saeed Jalili, who got just 4.1 million votes.

Voter turnout, 36.7 million, was just under three-quarters of the 50.5 million eligible voters, a high figure in view of some public calls for a boycott.

An enormous crowd of chanting and cheering supporters flooded Haft-e-Tir Square in the center of Tehran and Kharim Khan street, where Rowhani's headquarters were located. Many of them wore purple T-shirts or scarves, the color of his campaign.

Rowhani, a moderate conservative, apparently intends to take on a different color, adopting the green mantle of the reform movement that failed to win the presidency four years ago in an election that many said was marred by massive fraud. On Friday night, he tweeted to followers: “Let's do something to celebrate success tomorrow; the day that our purple vote gives way to the green.”

While Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Shiite supreme leader, sets all major policy and can block almost any action by the president, Rowhani could have an impact across society and in Iran's relations with the rest of the world. He has pledged to reverse the damage done during Ahmadinejad's eight years in office.

Rowhani's pledges during the campaign to improve the country's human rights practices won him wide support among young Iranians, who packed his rallies and cheered him like a rock star.

In Mashad, Iran's second-biggest city, the 64-year-old Rowhani Wednesday night pledged before nearly 50,000 people to restore safety and academic freedom to universities, in contrast with Ahmadinejad, who often sent in the police.

“We are talking about running a country, not a police station,” he declared to shouts and chants.

“I promise all of you that the era of extremism will end,” he said.

In a televised debate on social and cultural policy a week before the vote, he called for equal rights for women, freedom of the press, an abandonment of the ban on satellite television receivers, and for the government to remove itself from the arts in general. “If we want to eliminate corruption from the society, we should give freedom to the press,” he said, opening the prospect of a dramatic shift from the present situation in which the media act as the regime's mouthpiece.

Like all eight of the contenders for Iran's highest elected office — two dropped out in the final week — Rowhani was chosen for the contest by the Guardian Council, which reports to the supreme leader. He is an establishment insider, sitting on two top governing bodies that also report to Khamenei, the Expediency Council and the Council of Experts.

Unlike other candidates, Rowhani brings his own think tank to the job, having headed the Center for Strategic Research, which analyzes economic and social issues as well as foreign policy, for 22 years. The center is linked to the powerful Expediency Council, a body appointed by Khamenei that supervises all branches of government.

But Rowhani also is a former negotiator on the most contentious issue between Iran and the international community, the country's nuclear enrichment program, which the U.S., Israel and other countries fear may lead to production of a nuclear weapon.

He made a point in many presentations of saying that while he served as negotiator under the last reformist president, Mohammad Khatami, the major powers did not refer the issue to the U.N. Security Council, as has happened repeatedly during Ahmadinejad's tenure.

Ahmadinejad also provoked criticism and tensions by suggesting Israel did not have the right to exist and by calling a conference of so-called experts who deny there was a Holocaust during World War II. It's possible that all this could change.

Although not a reformist as such, he is close to the reformist group and was their candidate. Possibly the biggest boost to his candidacy came last Tuesday, when reformist Mohammad Reza Aref dropped out of the race in favor of Rowhani.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.