$21M Kandinsky auction falls short
LONDON — Russian painter Wassily Kandinsky's Expressionist masterpiece “Studie zu Improvisation 3,” 1909, was the highlight and leading indicator for a flat Christie's Impressionist and modern art sale on Tuesday.
The painting fell short of its top estimate and a record for the artist at auction when it sold for just more than $21 million, the world's largest auctioneers said.
The early 20th century artist's vibrantly colored painting of a knight on horseback was the highlight of the sale with a top estimate of $24.19 million. A similar painting set a $23 million record for Kandinsky's work last year.
The Russian Expressionist was not the only leading light in a 44-lot auction that included works from Pablo Picasso, Henry Moore, Rene Magritte, Amedeo Modigliani and Paul Signac.
The auction total for the evening of $100 million fell short of a pre-sale top estimate of $122.7 million but was well above the low estimate at $82.5 million.
“There is a supply problem,” said London-based dealer Alan Hobart. “So many of the top things have gone into foundations and museums. There are eight sales a year in London and New York, and Christie's and Sotheby's are struggling to fill them.”
Jay Vincze, Christie's London international director and head of Impressionist and modern art, called the sale “solid” and said it displayed continuing strength in selling rates.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.